<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Femmes Fatales No 54</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philobiblon.co.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197</link>
	<description>Green politics, history (particularly women's history) science and books. Always feminist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:45:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Femmes Fatales No 55 - Philobiblon</title>
		<link>http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197&#038;cpage=1#comment-1740</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Femmes Fatales No 55 - Philobiblon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 23:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197#comment-1740</guid>
		<description>[...] It really does make my life easier!    Posted in Friday Femmes Fatales&#160;(Friday May 5, 2006 at 11:35 pm) - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It really does make my life easier!    Posted in Friday Femmes Fatales&nbsp;(Friday May 5, 2006 at 11:35 pm) &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: witchy-woo</title>
		<link>http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197&#038;cpage=1#comment-1720</link>
		<dc:creator>witchy-woo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 23:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197#comment-1720</guid>
		<description>Wow! Thanks Natalie! I&#039;m really honoured to get a mention here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Thanks Natalie! I&#8217;m really honoured to get a mention here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie Bennett</title>
		<link>http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197&#038;cpage=1#comment-1711</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 10:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197#comment-1711</guid>
		<description>Thanks EL. There&#039;s just so much out there...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks EL. There&#8217;s just so much out there&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EL</title>
		<link>http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197&#038;cpage=1#comment-1705</link>
		<dc:creator>EL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 00:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197#comment-1705</guid>
		<description>This is a fab feature - I adore being introduced to new awesome bloggers of the feminist persuasion.

just wanted to say &quot;thanks&quot; and to say &quot;double thanks&quot; for making it a sidebar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fab feature &#8211; I adore being introduced to new awesome bloggers of the feminist persuasion.</p>
<p>just wanted to say &#8220;thanks&#8221; and to say &#8220;double thanks&#8221; for making it a sidebar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clanger</title>
		<link>http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197&#038;cpage=1#comment-1693</link>
		<dc:creator>Clanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197#comment-1693</guid>
		<description>cf. the Lady Chatterley trial in 1960:

&quot;The prosecution was ridiculed for being out of touch with changing social norms when the chief prosecutor, Mervyn Griffith-Jones, asked if it was the kind of book &#039;you would wish your wife or servants to read&#039;.&quot;
[Wikipedia]

I wonder if schools still ban Larkin&#039;s &quot;This Be The Verse&quot;, whilst the kids trundle between lessons listening to gangsta rap on their iPods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cf. the Lady Chatterley trial in 1960:</p>
<p>&#8220;The prosecution was ridiculed for being out of touch with changing social norms when the chief prosecutor, Mervyn Griffith-Jones, asked if it was the kind of book &#8216;you would wish your wife or servants to read&#8217;.&#8221;<br />
[Wikipedia]</p>
<p>I wonder if schools still ban Larkin&#8217;s &#8220;This Be The Verse&#8221;, whilst the kids trundle between lessons listening to gangsta rap on their iPods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie Bennett</title>
		<link>http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197&#038;cpage=1#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>Clanger, I think that is a perfect judge story. He&#039;s trying to show he&#039;s human by showing a &quot;GSOH&quot;, but the subject of that humour shows he lives in another world to those who appear before him.

And thanks Ahistoricality - do follow that links folks. It is a doozy. The White House spin operation has certainly lost its way. (Sorry, bad pun...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clanger, I think that is a perfect judge story. He&#8217;s trying to show he&#8217;s human by showing a &#8220;GSOH&#8221;, but the subject of that humour shows he lives in another world to those who appear before him.</p>
<p>And thanks Ahistoricality &#8211; do follow that links folks. It is a doozy. The White House spin operation has certainly lost its way. (Sorry, bad pun&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahistoricality</title>
		<link>http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197&#038;cpage=1#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahistoricality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>That is indeed a cricket bat in our President&#039;s hand: I recognize the picture from his &lt;a href=&quot;http://ahistoricality.blogspot.com/2006/03/lighter-stuff.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pakistan visit a few months back&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is indeed a cricket bat in our President&#8217;s hand: I recognize the picture from his <a href="http://ahistoricality.blogspot.com/2006/03/lighter-stuff.html" rel="nofollow">Pakistan visit a few months back</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clanger</title>
		<link>http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197&#038;cpage=1#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>Clanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philobiblon.co.uk/?p=1197#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>Re: &quot;Mo Pie on Big Fat Deal has meanwhile been expressing a wish ... for an overweight woman to be shown on television as sexy and desirable.&quot;

I&#039;m going to regret this, but I may be the only person on here who catches bits of daytime TV during mid-morning flapjack, milkshake and teletext sessions:

Fern Britton. Daily.

For any bored high court judges out there, here&#039;s today&#039;s secret code as a postscript:
BBC2-201-338-501.

Reference for the bemused: http://tinyurl.com/rwz8t

Am I the only one to find that weird? Is this a new feature of the judicial system? Should we expect future high court verdicts to be delivered as podcasts by Mr. Hat from South Park?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: &#8220;Mo Pie on Big Fat Deal has meanwhile been expressing a wish &#8230; for an overweight woman to be shown on television as sexy and desirable.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to regret this, but I may be the only person on here who catches bits of daytime TV during mid-morning flapjack, milkshake and teletext sessions:</p>
<p>Fern Britton. Daily.</p>
<p>For any bored high court judges out there, here&#8217;s today&#8217;s secret code as a postscript:<br />
BBC2-201-338-501.</p>
<p>Reference for the bemused: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/rwz8t" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/rwz8t</a></p>
<p>Am I the only one to find that weird? Is this a new feature of the judicial system? Should we expect future high court verdicts to be delivered as podcasts by Mr. Hat from South Park?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
