Monthly Archives: January 2009

Environmental politics

Getting back to basics

I thought this New York Times piece brought into layman’s terms the economic/environment conundrum:

Right now, it seems almost impossible to imagine ever spending more on things except, maybe, gasoline. And yet the prospect of less consumption fills us with dread. It’s not the having less part that is frightening — people are generally happy as long as everybody’s in the same boat. What’s frightening is the fear that our system can’t handle less, and it’s not as if there’s some other system out there shouting: “Try me! Try me!”

And if you want to take a longer view, maybe we’ve got to – somehow – abolish the whole judgement implied in the word “taste”, if you follow the view that the chase for taste drives consumerism.

Carnival of Feminists

Carnival of Feminists No 71

Drumroll please…. the Carnival of Feminists No 71 is now up on Hop To It!. And a superfine collection of posts it is too; I was particularly taken by the piece about a mother telling a boy to not assume that because he couldn’t lift something, his sister also couldn’t.

But Hops also gets a special extra cheer for an innovation – a list of feminists who you should follow on Twitter. I confess that I haven’t entirely worked out myself what Twitter’s for, for me, although you will find me there, and I’ve now expanded my “Twitter-roll”. (Okay, that’s obviously not the right word – can any cognoscenti tell me what is?)

And somehow it seems to fit here; I’ve just found that Marie Antoinette has a blog – and very classy (in a positive sense) it is too.

Feminism

A “women’s” recession/depression?

Women have found employment opportunities (maybe not great, well-paying opportunities, but something) in retail and service industries in huge numbers, and now they are being made redundant in huge numbers, from the counter workers in Woolworths to the domestic cleaners of Canary Wharf workers. In fact double the rate.

What’s more, it may be that they are even in the same jobs being differentially laid off more often than men – clearly this is something that needs to be monitored, and if necessary prevented (unions and government need to keep a very close count).

And one of the things we know can be a trigger, if not a cause, of divorce is financial stress – and there is now definitive evidence showing how the divorce law still leaves women worse off, and men better off. Maybe now the Fathers For Justice types will stop bleating?

Jenkins found that the positive effect on men’s finances is so significant that divorce can even lift them out of poverty, while women are far more likely to be plunged into destitution. Separated women have a poverty rate of 27% – almost three times that of their former husbands.
Maintenance paid by former partners also has little impact, said Jenkins, as just 31% of separated mothers receive payment from the father of their children.

BUt there is a positive message for women in there: don’t give up your job! “The percentage change in income is less if they have worked beforehand and continue working afterwards.”

Science Women's history

Margaret Cavendich, Duchess of Newcastle: definitely a feminist

“It is not only uncivil and ignoble, but unnatural for men to speak against women and their liberties … Men are happy, and we women are miserable, for they possess all the ease, rest, pleasure, wealth, power and fame, whereas women are restless with labour, ceaseless with pain, melancholy for want of pleasure, helpless for want of power and die in oblivion for want of fame; nevertheless men are so unconscionable and cruel against us as they suffer us freely to associate amongst our own sex, but would fain bury us in their houses or beds as in a grave; the truth is we live like bats or owls, labour like beasts, and die like worms.”

(Quoted in Kathleen Jones’s A Glorious Fame – 1988, Bloomsbury.)

She’s a controversial figure – but having read this (I think the first of the modern crop of biographies, there having been several since, and a whole school now of “Margaret Cavendish studies”) — I’m definitely down on the side of she was interesting, brilliant, and no more mad than many an aristocrat. (And a lot of her odder scientific fantasies are no more curious than those held by the Royal Society at the same time – and if you’re going to be labelled as one of the inventors of science fiction, you’ll have a vivid imagination for sure.)

Jones’s conclusion is: “she possessed a great natural gift and an insatiably curious mind, both totally frustrated by the restrictions placed on her sex.” (p. 93)

And I think it is telling that Jones’ notes about the reaction to her early work — some said she was mad outright, some said she was a deluded woman, and some said they were too good to have been written by a woman and must have been her husband’s — so neatly sums up the typical ways of dismissing women’s work that all of the critics can safely been ignored.

So re-read that quote at the top, admire her, and read something of hers: I’m off to abebooks now…

And this seems a good place to point to Ada Lovelace Day, a project by which “I will publish a blog post on Tuesday 24th March about a woman in technology whom I admire but only if 1,000 other people will do the same.” And it’s already past 1,000 – but no reason not to keep going…

(I don’t participate in a lot of these web projects, since if I did I’d do little else, but historical women in science are a particularly neglected group.)

Books Environmental politics Science

The baiji, or a cautionary tale of how the human race can ignore approaching disaster

In Douglas Adams’ Hitchhikers’ Guide to the Galaxy series, the dolphins disappear suddenly from the earth leaving only a cryptic message: “So long, and thanks for all of the fish.” Should Qi Qi, one of the last ever Yangtze river dolphins, have been able to leave a message before his sad death after decades of life in a sterile, small concrete tank, it might well have been a variant of that: “So long, and thanks for nothing.”*

For this dolphin species, indeed this whole mammalian family, the Lipotidae, which has existed for around 21.5 million years, is now extinct. The story of how that was allowed to happen is told by the British conservation biologist Samuel Turvey, in Witness to Extinction: How We Failed to Save the Yangtze River Dolphin.

It is a story from which almost no one, except Turvey himself, and a handful of other individuals, emerges well. No one knows, and no one probably will ever now know, exactly what killed the baiji (its Chinese name. It’s scientific name is Lipotes vexilifer). It might have been the hideous pollution of the river, it might have been the illegal and vicious fishing methods in regular use, it might have been the river’s use as a major transport highway that made it a cacophonous obstacle course of deadly propellers: probably it was a combination of all of these things.

The Chinese government was culpable, certainly. It never made any serious effort not only to address these issues (which clearly would be a mammoth undertaking), but also failed to develop a safe refuge area in which the species might have been preserved. Yet this, as Turvey shows, is a developing world government in a country with no tradition at all of conservation, so that is perhaps understandable, if not excusable.

But clearly on this account even greater opprobrium should be laid at the feet of the international conservation organisations and prominent experts, which might have been expected to throw every conceivable resource at preserving this beautiful, charismatic, important species. Instead, Turvey finds, they are handicapped by a fear of failure, by an unpractical ideology, by a simple failure to face the facts.

That ideology comes down to a persistent belief that species should be preserved by preserving their habitat, not captive breeding programmes. Of course that’s a fine ideal, but clearly also sometimes — particularly in developing countries, and increasingly in a climate-changed world — is going to be impossible.

Turvey, in partnership with one other individual, Leigh Barrett, wrenched together enough money to create the starting point for what might have been a captive breeding programme. But sadly, when the careful scientific survey that they arranged was carried out in 2007, there were no baiji left.

Now, the only real memory of the baiji, what will give it a faint, ghostlike existence, is this book, which tells as much as will ever be known of its complete story: how the Chinese traditionally regarded it as a tragic maiden transformed into this beautiful, graceful creature, revered as a goddess; how ancient writers reported how it was used by boat people as a warning of danger; and how it was brought to scientific recognition by a 17-year-old son of a missionary (inevitably pictured here with one he shot). You might consider it one very small stroke of luck for the species that it has such a fine euologist – a scientific expert who writes with passion and style.
read more »

Carnival of Feminists

Carnival of Feminists No 70

Drumroll please ….. the Carnival of Feminists No 70 is now up on Sheffield Fems, and a superb collection of posts it is too (and I’m not just saying that because I’ve been to a couple of great feminist conferences in Sheffield.)

There’s an excellent video post – we probably should see more of those (I’m personally a word person myself, but a neat little YouTube video does seem to be a great way to make a splash these days.)

But don’t waste time over here – do go over there and check it out!

And when you’ve done that, you might also find the Four Stone Heath carnival (anthropology) of interest.