Monthly Archives: May 2010

Books Feminism Politics Women's history

Want to know why we should get out of Afghanistan?

Article first published as Book Review: Raising My Voice: The Extraordinary Story of the Afghan Woman Who Dares to Speak Out by Malalai Joya on Blogcritics.

When I was running for the Green Party in the recent British general election, there was one issue on which I had no doubt how audiences at hustings and meetings would react positively – our call to withdraw British (and NATO) troops from Afghanistan. Surveys show around 70% of the public back that stance, and it was close to 100% of the audiences at hustings.

As I told them, I’d had in the past some doubts about our party’s policy of immediate withdrawal, having been worried about the human rights situation that we’d leave behind, particularly for women. But it was a Human Rights Watch report last year, which found 60-80% of the marriages of Afghan women and girls are forced, and learning that the brave women of Rawa are calling for withdrawal that led me to change my mind.

Having just read the autobiography of Malalai Joya, an outstanding Afghan woman MP, I’m now even more strongly of that view. (It was published in the US as A Woman Among Warlords: The Extraordinary Story of an Afghan Who Dared to Raise her Voice.)

She’s an extraordinarily brave, stalwart – and very, very young! — woman who has dedicated her life, and taken enormous risks, to speak out on human rights in her native land. And she says very clearly – and loudly and publicly in her own land, which led to her being expelled from parliament – that the people the U.S. and its allies are backing in Afghanistan are entirely the wrong people, the old warlords, many of them in her eyes (and those of others) war criminals. And she has no doubt that this foreign occupation can only prolong and amplify her nation’s problems.

Her story is an extraordinary one. Certainly, she was lucky in her parents, particularly her father, a democracy activist who moved his family around Iran and Pakistan as an exile in search for good schooling for them. (He, like the rest of her family, can’t be identified for their own safety – the name ”Joya” is one she adopted to protect them.) There must be many other potential Malalai Joyas in Afghanistan who will never get that essential foundation or confidence.

But there’s no doubt she was exceptional. Noticed as a fine teacher in the refugee camps, at the age of 21 she was sent to found an underground girls’ school in Herat by the Organisation For Promoting Women’s Capabilities. Only three years later, she was appointed to head its work in three provinces, just before 9/11. Under the new regime, despite its resistance, on her account she set up a clinic, orphanage and was able to distribute food supplies.

She must thus have been well known in the poor isolated province that was to send her, a 25-year-old unmarried woman, as a delegate to the 2003 Loya Jurga (national gathering) that was to approve a new constitution. Still standing for office, addressing a room full of women mostly older than herself, in her first “political speech” must have been quite an experience, and her delicate naivete is touching….

“I had a lot to say, and I wanted to cram those few minutes with everything I had ever done in my life, with everything I believed possible for the future, with everything I wanted for the women of Afghanistan. I stressed that I would never compromise with those criminals who had bloodied the history of our country, and that I would always stand up for democracy and human rights.

“As I spoke, I knew that my message must be getting through, because when the other women were speaking, members of the audience were chatting and making noise and not paying much attention. But as I began to speak everyone quietened down and listened. They even clapped a number of times during my speech…"

Yet, worryingly, as she made her way to the Loya Jirga, she gets strong warnings, not just from Afghans, but from UN officials, not to speak so bluntly there. She says: “Most of them seemed sincerely worried. I am not sure, but it is possible that some of them wanted to scare me into silence.”

read more »

Politics

A real enthusiasm for democracy

One of the things that I’ve noticed on the doorstep around St Pancras and Somers Town in this and previous election is the enthusiasm among the Somali community for democracy and engagement with it.

I think it was the European elections, or it might have been the GLAs, when I knocked on the door of a group of middle-aged women who’d clearly been having an afternoon coffee. They were absolutely delighted to have a canvasser at their door, proudly showed off their polling cards, which they were carrying around with them, and explained their understanding of the voting system.

And today, I met the latest in a long series of serious, considering voters – or in this case voters’ helper. She didn’t have a vote herself, she said, since she was only visiting from The Netherlands, but she was collecting literature from all of the parties and would be explaining it carefully and in an unbiased way, to two relatives who couldn’t read English, so they could make a considered decision.

I believed her – and I’m sure the explanation will be a good one – for we then went on to have a debate about voting systems and the virtues of proportional representation, and while she might not have known all of the terminology, she had certainly thought about the issues, and had been comparing the British and Dutch voting systems (with some bemusement at the unrepresentative nature of the former).

I’ve no idea how any of those women did or will vote, but I can only delight in their delight in democracy.

Blogging/IT Politics

Britblog Roundup No 267

I can make a claim to fame for this edition of the roundup unlikely, I suspect, to be repeated soon: it is being written by a parliamentary candidate three days before the general election (oh, and I’ve got an important council election to worry about too).

But I can at least make the claim to not be the sort of political candidate who just takes up blogging for the election…

You’ll forgive me, I hope, if I’m on the brief side. But I’m following the usual rule of taking all nominations, whether than I agree with them or not, as I’m sure you’ll see.

So I suppose, given the date, I have to start with politics – and a very fine post from Brian Barder. You’ll see a lot of notes on a well-hung parliament over the next few days, but once you’ve read this you won’t need any others.

For something different, Mary Beard has been looking at ancient Roman political gaffes, and Chicken Yoghurt has been looking inside David Cameron’s head, and Sunny on Pickled Politics has been looking into the religion of Phillipa Stroud.

Considering the issues, Jim on The Daily (Maybe) explores immigration, Gaian Economics offers some alternative thoughts on debt, and on practical politics Two Doctors look at a Scottish attempt to raise the minimum wage.

Then proving I’m doing this impartially, I go to the Britblog founder Tim Worstall for his defence of markets (which might have something to do with Tory education policy, and Heresy Corner explores the strengths of Gordon Brown.

Not really a lot of nominations this week; I suspect it might have something to do with lots of our regular participants doing politics rather than reading or writing about it.

In the not quite politics category comes this report from Waking Hereward on a poll on the anthem to be played for English victories at the next Commonwealth Games. It’s a call for action.

And more seriously, on the F Word Sarah Jackson blogs about Education for Choice an organisation that looks likely to be even more necessary in the new parliament.

And Neil Craig is concerned about the killing power of Chinese submarines.

But for something completely different, you could go cycling in Bahrain. You might think flat desert – easy. But you’d have forgotten about the headwinds…

And you might think of the Middle Ages as all muck and mud – that’s until you read Elizabeth Chadwick’s account of the Empress Matilda’s bling. You might think MPs expenses are bad, but royalty’s were a great deal worse…

So that’s it for the Britblog until after the election. Odds on its being filled with debate out how to untangle a hanged parliament? Ladbroke’s it would appear, has closed the book on that.

Feminism

Fundamentalist Christian influence – a real cause for election concern

The Observer today has an expose on Philippa Stroud, expected on Friday to be a Tory MP. She’s a fundamentalist Christian who has been praying to rid Britain of homosexuality – not in some sort of metaphorical sense, but directly and purposefully ecause she believes that’s what God wants and she wants to get him to do it. And she’s tried to do the same thing with individuals.

At a personal level, this kind of thing has a hideous effect on people – as the Observer quotes… “Angela Paterson, who was an administrator at the Bedford church, said: “With hindsight, the thing that freaks me out was everybody praying that a demon would be cast out of me because I was gay. Anything – drugs, alcohol or homosexuality, they thought you had a demon in you.”

It is something that I feel strongly about after an experience in Bankok. A Christian woman I knew had lots of personal issues, and also physical health issues. She arrived on my door one day in a terrible state, because she was ill (mostly related to diabetes), but mostly because the Christians with whom she lived had thrown her out because they were convinced the illness came from demonic possession. Not only had they thrown out an ill woman, they also dumped her possessions on the street, in case they were possessed…. She had been brainwashed into more than half believing they were right.

Of course all parties have prospective MPs with odd views, but Stroud apparently has great influence in the party – this a party that has Chris Grayling, who wants to allow prospective B&B guests to be thrown out on the street if they happen to be gay, and a leader who wants to reduce the abortion limit.

And this isn’t only limited to the Tories. Shockingly the allegedly “liberal” Liberal Democrats have had at least three MPs who have had interns from the heavily misnamed Care (Christian Action, Research and Education), which is anti-homosexual and anti-abortion rights – Paul Burstow, Tim Farron, and Steve Webb. (And there are also at least three Labour MPs.)

And there are also three Labour MPs, and SEVEN Tories.

Unfortunately none of these issues have been really aired in the election debates, but it does raise the question of whether the nasty, bigoted, “back to the 50s on ‘moral’ questions” party has really changed. Just look at where the money comes from.

Abortion Rights is already gearing up for a huge fight in the next parliament to defend access to abortion, and I fear similar struggles on other ‘moral’ issues.