The mystery of the 16th-century sideboard
Why, oh why? Life’s little mysteries can haunt you. Various sources I’ve read agree that in the 16th and probably early 17th century, drinks were served from a “sideboard” or “press cupboard”, and cups were not placed down on the table. One explanation I’ve read for this was that cups were rinsed between use, but a visit today to the Geffrye Museum came up with another – this was to protect the tablecloth. But really – does that make sense? Before the age of 18th-century politeness, wouldn’t the tablecloth have suffered anyway?
I’ve written up a substantial account of the visit on My London Your London – including a rather nice watering can used for purposes you probably wouldn’t imagine. And Pepys’ curtains.
I also enjoyed an account from Cesar de Saussure in 1726, exclaiming about the cleanliness of London houses, which were washed from top to bottom at least twice a week. And, he noted, kitchen utensils kept scrupolously clean – which does make you wonder what the French were doing at the time. (You can also read his account of highwaymen.)
Interesting other snippet: Between 1709 and 1831, candles were taxed.
The only interior in the building that survives in reasonably original condition is the chapel, which boasts this fine memorial:

To the founder, of course, and his wife, Dame Percilla, “daughter of Luke Cropley esq”. She died in 1676 at the age of 43.



Speculation, no sources on this: A sideboard, if it’s fixed to (or at least set against) the wall, is likely to be more stable and level than a free-standing table (especially if the table and the floor don’t quite meet at all the expected contact points), so the sideboard might be a more consistently safe place for open containers of liquid?
Comment by Penny — March 4, 2007 @ 11:44 pm
Makes sense – and perhaps the floor near the wall was likely to be more stable and level. And you look at the pottery of the time and it often doesn’t look very stable.
Comment by Natalie Bennett — March 5, 2007 @ 9:12 pm
[...] latest contribution to the global warming debate and Green feminist Natalie Bennett ponders, um, sideboards and the new Musee du quai Branly. Turning to law and order, Jim Jay isn’t feeling anxious, afraid [...]
Pingback by British Blog Review » Anorak: Celebrity|Finance|Money — March 12, 2007 @ 6:28 am