Weekend reading
* There’s a warning for Britain in a piece on the consequences of social inequality:
Research indicates that high inequality reverberates through societies on multiple levels, correlating with, if not causing, more crime, less happiness, poorer mental and physical health, less racial harmony, and less civic and political participation. Tax policy and social-welfare programs, then, take on importance far beyond determining how much income people hold onto.
* There’s hope for my squash game yet: in a piece on a 41-year-old American Olympic swimmer:
Hirofumi Tanaka, the director of the Cardiovascular Aging Research Laboratory at the University of Texas at Austin, found that both elite and nonelite runners and swimmers could maintain personal bests until age 35, after which performance declined in a gradual, linear fashion until about age 50 to 60 for runners and 70 for swimmers. Deterioration was rapid from there. … At Yale University, Ray Fair, a runner and an economist, crunched statistics on aging and peak athletic performance and created what he calls the Fair Model. The model provides a table of coefficients that enable an athlete to take a personal-best time and compute how long he or she should expect to take to complete that same event at a specific point later in life (assuming he or she has continued to train at the same level). … “I am struck by how small the deterioration rates are,” Fair wrote in a paper titled “How Fast Do Old Men Slow Down?” “It may be that societies have been too pessimistic about losses from aging for individuals who stay healthy and fit.”
* A horrifying report about a herbicide that has infilitrated the British food chain (and no doubt elsewhere).
It appears that the contamination came from grass treated 12 months ago. Experts say the grass was probably made into silage, then fed to cattle during the winter months. The herbicide remained present in the silage, passed through the animal and into manure that was later sold. Horses fed on hay that had been treated could also be a channel.
The worst bit? “Guy Barter, the RHS head of horticultural advisory services, said… ‘Our advice is not to eat the vegetables because no one seems to have any idea whether it is safe to eat them and we can’t give any assurances,’ he said.



Hey, do you think you could, you know, turn off comments in the carnival thread?
All mAndrea is doing is ignoring our actual replies and just telling us how we’re delusional schizophrenics and how she is so totally right.
Please just disallow any more comments on that post; don’t give her any more of a platform for her bigoted views than you already have.
Comment by drakyn — June 29, 2008 @ 9:07 pm
Pardon me, but as you’ve hosted a Carnival and the comment thread to it went to pot, what’s your stand on closing it or leaving it open, and why? I find the lack of response troubling, especially as you’ve made several posts since the Carnival was put up. I assumed since you delinked mAndrea you disagreed that her spewage would be a welcome addition, however, as it stands she’s still using your comments section as a platform for hate, so what gives? I didn’t think a Carnival was where people could park to spew bigotry against a group in a feminist space. To me, this isn’t a political matter so much as a ‘are they still considered human’ one.
Comment by A.W. — June 30, 2008 @ 2:22 am
I replied privately to emails, a view that I will repeat here – I think that censorship on the web, such as closing a thread, is counterproductive – making the attackers feel as though they have “won”, have driven the opposition from the field. I trust readers to be able to judge people for themselves from what they’ve said.
Comment by Natalie Bennett — June 30, 2008 @ 7:36 am
But your silence speaks volumes. If I were to hazard a guess, just from your actions (and inaction) I would say that you agree with mAndrea that trans*folks are all disordered, perverted freaks who love getting raped. that is what it looks like, what with you linking to that bile, saying yu “thought it was a parody on the extremes of femininity practiced in some communities”, and then staying completely silent when that shit was defended and preached on your blog.
Plenty of blog owners let every comment through. Most of the good ones answer when someone says something fucked up.
Comment by drakyn — June 30, 2008 @ 5:58 pm
It would be prudent of you to put your answer on why the bigots are allowed to run rampant and why you continue to remain inactive in the Carnival #59 post so all the other people may read it instead of in a totally different post where only the people who tried to get your attention reads it. They will not be likely to stumble upon your answer here. It does little good to answer in individual email or in this spot when the matter is in a seperate post. (I would’ve asked about the quiet in the other post, but considering the ‘thought it ’twas a parody’ comment after you said you skimmed it (because, to me, even the title of mAndrea’s post dripped bile. Rather very difficult to miss. Friendly parodies generally aren’t done by ~people outside the relevent group~ among other glaring differences. Otherwise it tends to be really fucking insulting. A parody pokes fun at observational “truths”; there is no truth sensed observable or otherwise that ~I~ can see in mAndrea’s post. That combined with your silence leaves me under the impression that you either tacitly agree with mAndrea despite your delinking and/or that you just couldn’t be bothered to pay attention to your own comment thread. I mean, answering indiviual emails is all well and good, but it doesn’t do anything for the people left in a lurch going “…and she’s not saying anything, why, exactly?”
Comment by A.W. — July 1, 2008 @ 12:33 am
No drakyn, I don’t think any of those things; I do however believe in free speech, as I’m demonstrating by leaving your comment. You have a point A.W., and I will do as you suggest.
Comment by Natalie Bennett — July 1, 2008 @ 10:58 pm