Author Archives: Natalie Bennett

Blaming the victim?

I’m currently reading Paul Farmer’s Infections and Inequalities: The Modern Plagues, for tomorrow night’s meeting of the Green Book Club that I’m probably now not going to make. (Sorry folks!)

I’ve anyway only read the first chapter, but its intellectual foundations, at the junction of participatory anthropology and medicine (the author being fully qualified in both), are spectacular illuminatory.

I’ve been musing all day on this passage:

This conflation of structural violence and cultural difference has marred much commentary on AIDS, especially when that commentary focuses on the chief victims of the disease: the poor. A related trend is the exaggeration of the agency of those most likely to become infected. Often such exaggeration is tantamount to blaming the victim. Explorations of AIDS have involved intense scrutiny of local factors and local actors, including the natives’ conceptions and stated motives. But it is possible to explain the distribution of HIV by discussing only attitude or cognition? After more than 15 years in Haiti, I would not hazard to comment on the psychological makeup specific to Haitians with AIDS… On the makeup of Haiti’s changing social conditions and their relation to Aids, however, much can be said. (p. 9 California Press 1999 edition)

It seemed particularly apt on a day when the Tories have found a new way to approach “back-to-basics”. They aren’t attacking single mothers this time – just cohabiting ones, and their partners for good measure. So the problems underlying the British underclass, in the Tory view, are economic – it is because they aren’t behaving, are exercising the limited agency available to them bady, by not trotting up to the altar. That nicely lets the economy and government off the hook then…

A detective in the age of Henry VIII

Everything we know about the morality and behaviour of Tudor times suggests that we would find the character of many of the people then — certainly those battling their way in the cutthroat world of the royal court — unattractive. Yet CJ Samson, in creating his detective character, the hunchback lawyer Matthew Shardlake, has found a way around this problem. The man whose deformity is often openly mocked and even causes superstitious fear — the credible genuinely believe that seeing a person so deformed will cause bad luck — is sensitive to other’s pain. He also cannot react to difficult and dangerous situations by whipping out his sword, as your average Tudor man would have done – in fact is believably a lot more like us than almost any other Tudor character might be.

Master Shardlake makes his third appearance in a novel simply entitled Sovereign – appropriately enough, since while the massive figure of Henry VIII hovered menacingly in the background in the first two novels, here he is centre stage, dominating the thoughts of everyone, even in his absence, as he leads the great Progress of the North of 1541. Still seeking to avoid becoming entangled in the intrigues of the court, Master Shardlake is lured into a delicate mission by Archbishop Cranmer. He is to protect a valuable prisoner, who knows secrets that could shake the foundations of the throne, until that prisoner can be taken to London for the hideous but calculated ministrations of the professional torturers in the Tower of London.

A man who can’t even face watching a bear-baiting, Master Shardlake is troubled by this, as he also tries to deal with the recent death of his father. Sansom develops the lawyer’s character beautifully, although he’s less sure in his handling of female characters. Here Tamasin, a young woman of the court, an orphan having to look out for herself, is central to the plot – becoming entangled, it seems to the point of marriage, with Master Shardlake’s rough clerk and oft-time bodyguard, Barak. The lawyer is understandable uncertain about her, but as we only ever see her from his point of view, she never really develops.

The physical reality of early modern life – the clothes, the smell, the severed heads on spikes above town walls – are, however, all beautifully laid out, and the detailed research behind the novel is evident in the accounts of the run-down, angry city of York — still seething after the “Pilgrimage of Grace” rebellion a few years before.

The politics of the court, its intrigues and maneouvres, are also, so far as this reader can tell, closely based on historical reality, where it is known, and the fictional additions are well-crafted. We know, of course, what is going to happen to the king’s young fifth wife, Catherine Howard, but that adds to, rather than detracts from, the suspense. And the traditional final twist at the end of the novel is beautifully done.

I complained when I reviewed the second novel in the series, Dark Fire, that Sansom’s writing style sometimes grated, and here it has definitely improved. Fewer individual words grate, and while sometimes the research shines through just a little too much, it now feels more integrated into the story.

It is perhaps just a little too early to start talking about Sansom in the same breath as the great historical novelist Edith Pargeter (Ellis Peters), but he is certainly heading in that direction. But while Peters’ Brother Cadfael, created in the 20th century, lived in a neat, just-desserts world, Master Shardlake’s is altogether messier – moral and physically – suiting today’s tastes.

Different forms of deprivation

The Observer has returned to a deprived area of Liverpool to visit an iconic 1993 photo of poverty, finding the girls pictured in it. Physical conditions have improved – at least a little – but the height of aspiration has hardly changed – hairdresser is the job to which most girls aspire, an alternative being a care assistant in a nursing home. How to push that up at least to nurse, if not doctor?

And then there’s environments – particularly in poor areas – that help to make you fat, thus cutting lifespan and greatly increasing morbidity.

The desperate fight for managed decline

Interesting piece from the Observer on the desperate (expensive) measures being taken by British newspapers to at least keep circulation declines at around the 5% level.

Only 88% of newspaper sales in November were actually made at full retail cover price. The rest were either cut-price or given away to the end consumer in bulk distribution deals such as on airlines or in hotels. This kind of activity is growing significantly, accounting for 12% of November’s ABC figures as opposed to only 9% a year ago – a very significant shift in such a short time.

Will they all end up as give-aways?

Election warning

A spring 2008 election?

Ms Blears’ letter, written on Labour-headed notepaper, says: “In the New Year we face real challenges, the election of a new leader, local elections and the need to prepare for the forthcoming general election, which may be less than 16 months away.”
She adds: “The Tories are making a comeback, the next general election will not be easy.
“A swing against Labour of just 1.3% could see the Tories forming the next government.”

The joys of church life

I’ve not been a churchgoer since about age 8 or 9, when I decided to stop going to Sunday school – my parents could hardly argue when I pointed out how dull it was, since they were about to start teaching exactly the same series of lessons for a second year in a row. But everything I’ve read and heard makes it sound pretty hideous, and now even the church has admitted it:

Churches in Britain are a “toxic cocktail” of bullying and terror, as parish priests struggle to lead congregations dominated by neurotic worshippers who spread havoc with gossip and manipulation…. Dr Savage says one of the problems is that churches are hierarchical systems, with all the attendant echoes of feudal society. Thus they elicit bad behaviour such as status seeking, fawning, bullying, passivity, blaming others and gossiping.

So why, one has to wonder, are “church leaders” consulted as some sort of experts on social issues by the media and others?