Author Archives: Natalie Bennett

On being a school governor

This evening I finished an eight-hour training course (done in four parts) that might have been entitled “the bare basics of being a school governor”. (There are many, many more courses to come… on PANDAs (a grid on which the school’s results are judge against others’ – now badly delayed, like much else, by computer problems); on SEFs (self-evaluation forms – vitally important as one of the chief ways Ofsted judges a school); on SIPs – which can be school improvement plans, or school improvement partners – roughly the old Ofsted link inspectors; on new disability legislation, and more.

I’ve now, I think, at least been lined up with the right buzzwords, and have a grasp of the overall framework in which the English education system is supposed to operate. (At least this year.)

Everything is captured under the “Every Child Matters” framework, which aims for five outcomes, for children
* to be safe
* to be healthy
* to enjoy and achieve
* to make a positive contribution to society
* to achieve economic wellbeing

This is the framework for all services – not just education, but also housing etc. It applies to under 18s, and under 19s with statements of special educational needs.

Under the Education Reform Act of 1988, every child is entitled to a curriculum that is “broad, balanced and relevant”, as, it is said, is set out in the 1989 national curriculum. That’s except religious education, which is still covered by the 1944 Act, which provides for a compulsor act of collective worship, although parents have the right to withdraw a child, and must be told they have that right.
read more »

Beyond parody

Shellfish caught in Scottish waters are to be shipped to Thailand to be shelled, then the meat shipped back to the UK, where it will be labelled “product of Scotland”. That means 120 jobs in Scotland go, and a good amount of fuel will be burnt by ships for the purpose of this piece of insanity.

The label “beyond parody” really doesn’t go far enough here.

Sshhhhh – don’t tell the marketing people

I’m reading, in very small snatches, Modernism on Fleet Street, by Patrick Collier (picked up from the London Library “new books” section because it has a chapter on Rose Macauley, about whom I’d like to know more.)

It covers the interactions between newspapers and some intellectuals, including TS Eliot and Virginia Woolf, and the panics around the rise of the “yellow”, popular press. All the kerfuffle now about blogs and online media – well it all sounds so familiar when you read this, written in 1922:

So, about 30 years ago, the ‘New Journalism’ was born. Headlines, scareheads, “snappy pars” and “stunts” took the place of literature, serious news and discussion. The note of papers rose from modulated reason to the yowl of an American baseball match, calculated not to convince but to paralyze the opponent. Pictures appeared, with adjectival commentations: “A Delightful Photo of a Charming Little Hostess”… The change has been so complete that one no longer notices anything about it.” (p.12)

But what really struck me was this little anecdote about marketing. (For those not in the UK I should preface this by noting that the dailies here are now locked in a vicious, and economically crazy, battle to offer “free” extras – CDs, DVDs, posters, dinosaur stickers! and similar.) So this felt immediately familiar:

“One of the period’s more dubious innovations was the circulation-inflating insurance scheme, in which anyone who died while carrying a copy of the newspaper would be given a death benefit.”

But please don’t pass this on to any marketing people you know… I wouldn’t want to be responsible.

If, however, you should be seeking a plot for a noir detective tale set in the Twenties – well it would make a great motive for murder – the marketing man desperate for his ploy to work.

A brilliant Carnival of Feminists

The Carnival of Feminists No 27 is up on Body Impolitic, and it is brilliant. There’s a great wrap-up of US election coverage, but also plenty of coverage from around the globe. But what really makes it stand out are some absolutely stunning images. You don’t even need to be able to read English to enjoy this one.

But don’t waste time over here: hop over there and check it out for yourself!

And when you’ve finished that, you can pop over to the call for submissions from Ginger on Diary of a Freak Magnet – she’s got lots of ideas should you want to write a special post for the carnival.

Scare-ree

Pastor Heneghan of Gospel Community Church sees the issue of population growth in more biblical terms, specifically those taken from Genesis and Revelation. “Some people think that what I’m doing–having eleven children–is wrong. I don’t really get into that much. The Bible says ‘be fruitful and multiply.’ That’s my belief system. They don’t believe in God, so they think we have to conserve what we have. But in my belief system, He’s going to give us a new earth.” Overpopulation isn’t a problem in a universe where God promises a clean global slate.

From The Nation, about a large and fast-growing sect (naturally!), Quiverfull, that believes “God” should entirely control how many children a woman has, and her husband control everything she does.

… and that the “whites” must work to “outbreed” the blacks.

Lovely.

How to tackle climate change?

I’ve no time for a serious and thoughtful post this evening, having spent most of the past few hours wrestling with Zonealarm. Why is it that anti-virus etc programmes always start out working well, then gradually get worse and worse?

I was going to uninstall and replace it, but it provide impossible to remove the programme without wrecking the machine – great way to keep people with you. So know I’ve bought the upgrade – and that won’t install. Grrrrrrrr!!!

Don’t get into Zonealarm is my advice.

Anyway, since I have no energy to do more than grumble, I’ll send you over to The Coffee House, for a not-too-serious quiz on climate change: what’s the best thing to do to tackle climate change. Nuking the US is offered as an option – undoubtedly effective, but no, I resisted the temptation to vote for it…

UPDATE: Link to quiz now added – sorry about that. I wasn’t in a good way last night!