Author Archives: Natalie Bennett

Men’s biological clock

When a couple cannot have children, there has always been an assumption that the problem is with the woman. I can still clearly remember the look of pain on my grandmother’s face as she described the “horrible” tests she endured (this must have been in theThirties) – and for a “proper” woman of that era the embarrassment and humiliation must have been great.

Yet at some level, of course, there was always some knowledge, no matter how basic, that at least sometimes the man was the problem. (If he’d been through enough wives/mistresses without begetting a child this was even tacitly acknowledged.)

Even today, however, that is seldom acknowledged, so a French study about men’s declining fertility is particularly interesting:

A father aged over 40 “is a key risk factor for reproduction”. For women under 30, a male partner aged 40 or over reduced their chances of conceiving by a quarter; for women between 35 and 37, a partner over 40 reduced conception to a one-in-three possibility.

…over the past five years similar investigations in Britain and the United States have anticipated the French findings, and have also found late fatherhood to be riskier than traditionally assumed. One study found would-be fathers over 40 half as likely to make their partners pregnant as men under 25; another found fathers over 50 quadrupling the likelihood of having a child with Down’s Syndrome.

A classy history carnival…

… is now up at Clioweb. I was particularly taken by Dr Virago’s post on Quod She about Margery Kempe (and not just because it gives me a new way of thinking about some of my English Civil War female “prophetesses”).

Elsewhere in the carnival – and do go to check it out – the BBC’s history unit is under fire over headless Romans, and there is a new timeline of dietary advice. I didn’t know that the key date is 1864:

“First known diet book published: “Letter on Corpulence,” calling for low carbs and daily booze, by William Banting, an English casketmaker who became alarmed when he could no longer tie his shoes. 58,000 copies sold.”

A non-standard day of canvassing

Two days before the election, today I canvassed some of the more “difficult” areas of my ward. It had interesting results. I had one man who greeted me with a tirade about how we f-ing politicians were all the f-ing same. (I said “sorry to disturb you” and walked off.)

Then I had an encounter that started as a fairly standard: “what do you want” shouted through the door. I explained “Green Party”, “election” etc, and got the response: “We vote Labour here.”

Fine, free country etc.

I’d knocked on a couple of doors down the balcony, and was in a dead-end, when I heard someone hiss “go”. I turned around and saw, a rottweiler from the “Labour” household, approaching rather quickly, hackles raised, having obviously been sooled on me. (They’d shut the door after letting the dog out.)

It was between me and the stairs. Luckily, it was a soft rottweiler really – I took a couple of fast steps toward it, rather than the away it probably expected, then as it went without great conviction for my leg wacked it, not very hard (the whole thing was not the dog’s fault, and I didn’t want to make it too angry), across the face with my floppy cardboard folder.

It decided it wasn’t really that interested. Luckily.

I left. Not at a run. Quite.
Lest this should discourage anyone from getting involved in politics let me say this is highly unusual – in fact I was talking to some experienced people later in the evening and they’d never heard anything like it.

I’m very tempted to go back tomorrow and stick a leaflet through their door, just to show I wasn’t cowed. Would be satisfying, although bad politics, since it would make them more likely to turn out to vote, I’d judge.

How ‘experts’ under-rate the public

The ‘experts’ are convinced that women are just “forgetting” to have children, relying too much on the not-so-miracle cure of reproductive technology to have babies relatively late in life. A poll today in the Guardian shows that isn’t the case:

The poll makes it clear that people are not relying on fertility technology to allow them to have children later. Only 35% of men and women said they would think of delaying having children because of it.

The results show that while most people think it is best to have a baby before 30 (they are answering a question about the “ideal”), they simply are not making this their top priority – above, say, personal happiness, by perhaps grabbing the first vaguely appropriate partner who comes along.

On that line, Libby Brookes drags out that old story about “too much choice” stopping people forming partnerships. Stuff and nonsense – turn the lens around the other way, and realise that in the past there was very little choice, and people got stuck in all sorts of horrible relationships, sometimes even going into them knowing they would be pretty awful, but feeling they had no other option. Celebrate choice!

Final call for the Carnival of Feminists nominations

Sorry, I have been a rather slack founder of the carnival this edition, having been distracted for reasons obvious to regular readers. So please, get your nominations in NOW. Morgaine of Women’s Autonomy and Sexual Sovereignty Movements says:

“I can’t wait to read all the submissions – blow me away, ladies!”

Email submissions to morgaine AT the-goddess DOT org, or use the submission form.

So what’s it like?

I may not be around a lot this week, since I’m going to be very involved with the final election run-in. For those just joining the story, I’m running for the Greens for Regent’s Park ward on Camden Council, and there is a significant chance that I might be elected.

If you’re wondering what a local election campaign in Britain is like, the BBC has a report on the Norwich campaign, which bears some resemblance to Camden, except they are, from the Green Party perspective, one more campaign along from us. We’re hoping to get at least half a dozen councillors, who could well end up with the balance of power in a NOC (No Overall Control, as the jargon has it) council, which is the situation in Norfolk now.

Campaigning basically involves knocking on lots of doors, or ringing lots of security buzzers, asking people to vote for us, and to put up our posters. (Highgate in particular has a real poster war going – I was in a street there yesterday in which about 25 per cent of the houses have posters, which shows that people will get involved in politics if you try hard enough. No Conservative posters, however – not sure if the Tories don’t do posters, or if being a Tory is so embarrassing that people refuse to publicly acknowledge it!)