Author Archives: Natalie Bennett

More blows to claims of human exceptionalism

It won’t come as a surprise to many owners, but scientists are coming to the conclusion that dogs do have a theory of the mind.

In a remarkable experiment to probe canine cognition, Prof Ludwig Huber and colleagues at the University of Vienna put dogs through a classic experiment done with children in which an instructor demonstrates to a toddler how to turn off a light using her forehead, once with her hands clearly visible and once when wrapped in a shawl, so that she can’t use them.
When invited to turn the light off for themselves, toddlers who were shown the first version use their heads, but those shown the second use their hands.
The standard interpretation is that the first group conclude that there must be a good but non-obvious reason for using the forehead method, as otherwise the instructor would have used her hands. Dogs do the same thing in Prof Huber’s experiments, where they had to pull a lever to obtain a reward, lending support to the idea that dogs have a rudimentary “theory of mind.

Researchers are also suggesting that they have a moral sense – and a sense of fairness. (Which I’d certainly agree with – my old Beanie and I came to a deal on dropped kebabs, hot chips etc, which with late night walks in Walthamstow were a common occurrence – she was allowed one mouthful, then I would insist that she left the rest. One night I absentmindedly tried to stop her getting the one mouthful – and that was how we ended up with a broken harness…. I wasn’t being fair.)

And elephants – unsurprisingly when you think they are an intelligent species – can add up small numbers.

Congratulations, green bloggers

… and particularly to Jim on The Daily Maybe, who has been rightly named by Iain Dale as the year’s top Green blogger.

In my opinion there’s a fine selection there – the Green blogosphere has come a long way in the past couple of years (and no, I’m not just saying that because I come in at No 7 – although thanks Iain).

But you’ve still got time to register your opinions, for Jim is running a people’s choice award. You’ve got until September 1 to vote.

(And finally, in the just deserts category – I’m not laughing, really, about the fact that a group of American climate change-deniers has had to postpone their meeting due to a tropical storm. No – storms aren’t caused by climate change, but their frequency is increased…)

Carnival of Feminists No 63

What I love about the Carnival of Feminists, as it roams around the blogosphere, is that each host brings their own distinctive touch to the collection, as well as introducing me to feminist bloggers I haven’t encountered before.

On both scores, the Carnival of Feminists No 63 now up on The Mind of Genevieve. I defy you to read it and not smile – whether it is the Badger possessed by Rightful Feminist Rage, or the Vera the Angry Tiger for Choice who takes your fancy.

It is also a carnival that roams the world, from New Zealand to Lebanon, from the Rocky Mountains to Afghanistan.

But don’t waste time over here – go over there and check it out!

Exploitation and choices

An interesting collection of articles around the sex work debate in an online magazine new to me: On the Issues: The Progressive Women’s Magazine.

And a reminder that most exploitation isn’t sexual: Sri Lanka is cutting back the number of maids it is sending to the Gulf due to exploitation and abuse.

Marlowe, Shakespeare and imagination

There’s a new remainder bookshop in Camden (everything £2, including many decent history books) – such a dangerous thing. And how I came to spend the afternoon reading a rather curious text: History Play: The Lives and Afterlife of Christopher Marlowe, by Rodney Bolt.

It’s what might be termed an imaginary history – heavily researched in part, with a lively account of later 16th-century London — then leaping off from a restaged version of Marlowe’s murder (a handy body-double is roped in) and following the not-really-dead playwright around the cities and courts of Europe, while he pens in his spare time the plays that Shakespeare will take credit for in London. (It ends with him sailing off to the New World, with a ship sinking along the way that becomes The Tempest.)

Now I’m unfashionably convinced that Shakespeare was actually Shakespeare — being a dedicatee of Ockham — but it does make for a fun read, although if you are going to go for alternative “authors” for Shakespeare I much prefer Robin P. Williams’ Sweet Swan of Avon, which has Mary Sidney, Countess of Pembroke, holding the pen.

But Bolt does write in a lively style, and has a real ear for an anecdote. I didn’t now that our term euphemism comes from the title of a prose romance, Euphues, by John Lyly, a Marlowe contemporary, which boasts “a peculiar, heightened style”.

Such fastidiousness wasn’t for the stage of the time, however. Bolt notes that “furious fenestraclasm” was a favourite mode of dramatic criticism: “In 1583 Trinity paid ‘for lv foot of newe glasse in the hall after the playes’, and subsequent to that took the precaution of ‘taking downe and setting up the glass wyndowes’ for the duration, while St John’s paid for ‘nettes to hange before the windowes of ye Halle”. (p. 39)

And Bolt is clear on the multiculturalism of this heaving, shifting Europe, in which, he says, strolling English players, crossing borders and language, were a major part: “The English comedians’ spontenaiety and vividness so enthused audiences that it revolutionised northern European theatre, turning what had previously been stuff, formal receitation into drama. … In Frankfurt, according to the 16th-century traveller Fynes Moryson, both men and woman ‘flocked wonderfully to see their gesture and Action, rather than heare them, speaking English which they understood not’, and at Elsinore in 1585, the citizens flocked so ‘wonderfully’ to a performance in the town hall courtyard that they broke down a wall.” (p. 76)

Advances on abortion

In a definitive study, the American Psychological Association has reported that: “The best scientific evidence published indicates that among adult women who have an unplanned pregnancy, the relative risk of mental health problems is no greater if they have a single elective first-trimester abortion or deliver that pregnancy.”

Of course you’d like to think that this will stop anti-abortion groups quoting false “statistics”, and causing unnecessary stress and worry – but somehow I doubt it.

(And yes this only refers to one abortion – the association says the evidence is simply unclear on more.)

Another interesting quote in the piece: “Approximately half of women in the United States will face an unintended pregnancy during their lifetime, and about half of those who unintentionally become pregnant resolve the pregnancy through abortion,” the report says.

In the Australian state of Victoria, meanwhile, reports suggest there’ll be a considerable advance next week, with the introduction of a bill to give women the legal right to choose abortion.

“It is believed the bill will ensure that a woman’s consent provides lawful authority for an abortion up to 24 weeks’ gestation. After that, terminations would be unlawful unless doctors deemed continuing the pregnancy would pose a risk of harm to the woman.
Health Minister Daniel Andrews, who will introduce the bill, is expected to argue that it is designed to bring the law into line with community expectations and clinical practice.”