Category Archives: Science

Environmental politics Science

Crows 1, Internet 0

Reminders to the human race of how much more powerful “Nature” is than its technology are never a bad thing, so one has to laugh that Tokyo is unable to control its crows, which are eating up its fibre-optic cable links.

Crows have discovered that the broadband cables, which are strung from telegraph poles across Tokyo, are the perfect consistency for building nests….Engineers called out to repair crow-ravaged cables say that the centre of destruction is generally around junction boxes, where an average of 30 cables meet and provide rich pickings.

Following earlier problems, the city had trapped 11,000 crows in a drive to reduce the population. They were, however, immediately replaced by crows flying in from the countryside.

There has to be a horror movie in there somewhere … Perhaps it isn’t the cockroaches that will take over from us.

Environmental politics Science

An advance for humanity…

… in recognising rights for our nearest relatives.

Spain is likely to pass legislation recognising rights for the great apes, species that share so many of our characteristics.

The law would eliminate the concept of “ownership” for great apes, instead placing them under the “moral guardianship” of the state, much as is the case for children in care, the severely handicapped and those in comas, said the MP behind the project, Francisco Garrido. … The law would also make it a criminal offence to mistreat or kill a great ape, except in cases of self-defence or medical euthanasia.

New Zealand and the UK have already banned medical experiments on great apes.

This reminds me of a short story I read many years ago that made a great impression. It was a Swiftian-style satire that had, as I recall, a human society passing a law saying animals could be used for food if there IQ was a certain percentage below the human average. Then aliens with a far higher intelligence arrive, and use that law against its makers. Anyone know the story?

Science

Serious and lighthearted science

A report today identifies two colonies of chimpanzees in a corner of Cameroon as the source of the HIV pandemic, suggesting that are the reservoir of the apparently harmless SIV virus that mutated when a hunter came in contact with chimpanzee blood. What’s particularly interesting is the timeframe:

Researchers believe the virus infected humans some time before the 1930s and was gradually spread by river travel. All of the rivers in Cameroon run into the Sangha, which joins the Congo river running past Kinshasa.

Trade along the routes could have spread the virus, which slowly built up in the human population….

The first clearly identified case of Aids reported in the United States was in 1981, though it seems an African American teenager died of it in St Louis in 1969.

Which does make you wonder how many other such viruses are building up out there. We sometimes think in the West that “modern medicine” understands everything, but as a the victim of a very nasty bug caught in India – variously diagnosed as chickenpox, typhus and “mystery tropical illness”, this last I’m sure the most accurate – I’ve was disabused of that myth.

Turning to more cheerful matters: the great riddle is answered – the egg came first.

Professor John Brookfield, a specialist in evolutionary genetics at the University of Nottingham, who was put to work on the dilemma, said that the pecking order was perfectly clear: the living organism inside the eggshell would have the same DNA as the chicken that it would become.

“Therefore, the first living thing which we could say unequivocally was a member of the species would be this first egg,” he said. “So I would conclude that the egg came first.”

Seems conclusive to me; an “almost-chicken” produced a chicken.

Somehow, though, I don’t think that will stop the debate, particularly in the pub around about closing time…

Science

Talking animals, human animals and endangered animals

Two new discoveries are reminders that Homo sapiens sapiens is just another member of the animal kingdom.

Researchers have found that the gloriously named putty-nose monkey communicates in “sentences”, having a syntax that puts together two “words” to mean something entirely different to either of them:

The monkeys call out ”pyows” to warn against a loitering leopard and ”hacks” are used to warn about hovering eagles overhead. However, combining pyow and hack means something like ”let’s go”, according to scientists from the University of St Andrew’s.

This report, from the journal Nature, implies sophisticated linguistic processing in the monkeys’ brains – to ignore the very strong individual meanings of the calls and put together the new meaning. And since these are not particularly high-level animals — it would perhaps have been less surprising were this to be found in chimpanzees or gorillas — it suggests this ability must be widely distributed in the animal kingdom. It is not that animals are too dumb to “talk, just that we’ve been insufficiently intelligent or switched-on to understand them.

darwincaricature Speaking of chimps, it seems the mockers of Charles Darwin closer to the truth than they would have liked. For research also reported in Nature suggests that interbreeding between human and chimp ancestors went on for much longer than previously thought – indeed there was a split, then a hybridization between the two groups before the final split, much later than the previously estimated 7 million years.

All of that might be taken as a further push – which sadly seems to be needed – to care for all of our relatives, both close and more distant. That reflection comes from the news that India’s tiger population has probably halved in just four years. The wild populations may not last out the decade.

History Science

The thrill of discovery

Reading my latest edition of The Historian a description by William Dampier of his first sight of flamingos caught my attention: They were, he wrote, ‘much like a heron in shape’ though ‘bigger and of a reddish color’ and in such numbers that from a distance they ‘appeared like a brick wall, their feathers being of the colour of new red brick’.. ‘The young ones are, at first, of a light grey.’

It left me musing on how few adults there must be, at least in the western world, who don’t have at least a vague idea of what a flamingo looks like. The thrill of discovery of something truly unknown, truly strange, that we’ve had not even an inkling of before, is denied us.

But perhaps I’m wrong – I read today that an entirely new family of primates has been found.

Scientists originally thought the monkey, named Rungwecebus kipunji after Mount Rungwe in Tanzania, was a type of mangabey from the genus Lophocebus. However, a more detailed genetic analysis of the animal showed its close connection to baboons.

Still – not quite the same thing as coming on that flock of flamingos. Thrilling no doubt to the scientist peering down at the DNA separation gel, but denied still to the rest of us.

Then again, we have moved on in many ways. Dampier concluded his disquisition on the subject of these curious words by noting: “The flesh is lean and black yet very good meat … their tongues have a large knob of fat at the root which is an excellent bit, a dish of flamingos’ tongues being fit for a princes’ table.’

Feminism Science

Men’s biological clock

When a couple cannot have children, there has always been an assumption that the problem is with the woman. I can still clearly remember the look of pain on my grandmother’s face as she described the “horrible” tests she endured (this must have been in theThirties) – and for a “proper” woman of that era the embarrassment and humiliation must have been great.

Yet at some level, of course, there was always some knowledge, no matter how basic, that at least sometimes the man was the problem. (If he’d been through enough wives/mistresses without begetting a child this was even tacitly acknowledged.)

Even today, however, that is seldom acknowledged, so a French study about men’s declining fertility is particularly interesting:

A father aged over 40 “is a key risk factor for reproduction”. For women under 30, a male partner aged 40 or over reduced their chances of conceiving by a quarter; for women between 35 and 37, a partner over 40 reduced conception to a one-in-three possibility.

…over the past five years similar investigations in Britain and the United States have anticipated the French findings, and have also found late fatherhood to be riskier than traditionally assumed. One study found would-be fathers over 40 half as likely to make their partners pregnant as men under 25; another found fathers over 50 quadrupling the likelihood of having a child with Down’s Syndrome.