Category Archives: History

History Politics

Something I should long have known

I grew up in the Sydney suburbs of West Ryde and Epping. Yet I’ve only just learnt that this was the tradition land of the Wallumedegal people, a clan of the Eora.

Books History Politics

Notes from Waves Across the South: A New History of Revolution and Empire

p. 12 “In 1793, two kidnapped Maori were brough to Norfolk Island off the coast of Australia, in order to teach convicts how to work the flax that grew on many of the island’s coastal cliffs. These two kidnapped men are now commonly called Tuki and Huru. They came to Norfolk Island on the Shah Hormuzear, which was crewed by lascars, and which had arrived at Port Jackson (now Sydney) from Calcutta. On their way to Norfolk Island they travelled in the company of 2,200 gallons of wine and spirits, six Bengal ewes and two rams. They were the first Maori to live in a European community, and the kidnapped Tuki, a priest’s son, and Huru, a young chief, became close to the commandant of the convict settlement, Philip Gidley King. King was unable to discern much about flax-workinf from the pair, given that it was women who worked the flax in their communities. Yet he got Tuki to draw a map.

One commentator noted the extent of Tuki’s interests …”not only very inquisitive respecting England & C. (the situation of which, as well as that of New Zealand, Norfolk Island and Port Jackson) he well knew how to find by means of a coloured general chart)… he was also “very communicative respecting his own country… Perceiving he was not thoroughly understood, he delineated a sketch of New Zealand with chalk on the floor. Tuki’s map of his “country” is extraordinary not only because it is thought to be the oldest map drawn by a Maori.. It shows …Mauis’s Fire, the North Ireland; and .. Greenstone Water, the South Island. … a double-dotted line across the North Island shows the road taken by the spirits of the dead … and the place for leaping off into the underworld. .. Within this map, and in the conversations that happened around its making, Tuki attended to population, harbours, the concentration of fighting men and the availability of water… On their return to New Zealand, Tuki and Huru became important intermediaries between Maori and the British.”

p. 16 Peter “Dillon was an erratic maritime adventurer and private trader with aspirations of greatness, an Irisman born in French Martinique in 1788. If he is to be believed, he had served in the Royal Navy at the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805. He then sailed for the Pacific. He was known to foster close relationships with South Pacific islanders, an attachment which began when he was resident in Fiji 1809-09, when he made “considerable progress in learning their language”… From 1908, he set himself up in Sydney, using it as a base for his private trade across the Pacific. He moved to Calcutta in 1816 and traded between Bengal and the Pacific. By this time, he had married. Mary Cillon accompanied him on his voyages from Calcutta. .. His voyage of 1825-6 falls squarely in the middle of the age of revolutions and Dillon’s career is a telling gauge of changing gimes. For the British Empire followed in the wake of people who may be placed next to Dillon, namely private traders, sailors, castaways, missionaries and so-called pirates. The new empire sought to reform their activities with more systematic colonisation, “free trade” and liberal government. In keeping with this shift to formal empire, Dillon spent the later phase of his life in Europe. He now combined a new set of interests, presenting plans for the settlement of the Pacific to the governments of France and Belgium and publishing a proposal for the colonisatio of New Zealand by the British. In the 1840s, he was an active member of a characteristic association of reform in mid-19th-century Britain, the Aborigines Protection Society, whihc was tied up with the humanitarian heritage of anti-slavery. He also set out a plan for sending Catholic missionaries to the Pacific. He died in Paris in 1847.”

p. 17 voyage of St Patrick of 1825-6 “around 20 British sailors who had joined the crew had served in Chile’s war of independence against Spain, under the command of Thomas Cochrane, a British naval officer who played a pivotal role in the rebel navies of Chile, Peru and Brazil in the 1820s… 11 Pacific islanders .. also had on board a Chinese cook and a Bengali steward… A disturbing story told by George Bayly, the third mate… involves Dillon’s wife Mary. “His wife lived on board and he very frequently have her a thrashing…”.. Bayly said of himself “never was a captive bird more pleased to get its liberty than I was.”.. these shipboard relationships were unstable, unpredictable and violent and based on gender, status and race”.

p. 91 The language of the American and French revolutions, and the example of the Batavian Republic, was used by the trekboer in support of a conservative culture of settlement. This culture of settlement generated a local age of revolutions. It included the boers’ commitment to the harsh discipline of slaves and aggressive conflict with indigenous peoples. Such practices set a context for the expansion of the counter-revolutionary British Empire.”

p. 92 “Among enslaved people, the revolutionary rhetoric of these decades drawn from overseas was fundamentally reworked to suit local agendas. The year 1808 saw a significant slave rebellion in Cape Town. It began when two Irishmen told the 30-year-old Louis, the keeper of a wine shop, who was an enslaved person owned by the “separated wife of Willem Kirsten” that in Ireland, England, Scotland and America “there were no Salves, but all free people, that all people ought to be set free”… a group of enslaved people proceeded to take control of 34 farms in Zwartland, Koeberg and Tygerberg, districts where grapes and grain were grown. After the revolt’s suppression, about 300 prisoners were take. Sixteen of them were sentenced to death, 244 were returned to their masters… The Irishmen were appregended while attempting to escape to sea from Saldanha Bay.”

p. 130 “The glorification of Wahhabi revolt, and the interpretation of it as revolutionary, emerged partly from the period’s colonial writings. Indeed, in the early 19th century and in the context of the Napoleonic era, the Wahhabis could be case as akin to the people of the Swiss cantons or the Dutch United Provinces set “against crusading Catholic potentates”. In this rendition they could be glossed positively for how they stoof up to Ottoman tyrannt. If this was a period when ‘revolution’ was an unstable term of reference, especially in the British perception of the concept, the Wahhabies were revolutionary. In addition, European commentators sought to make sense of the Wahhabis through analogy to the Christian past. These were the inspired “Protestant” Muslims.”

p. 160 “the Navigation Laws, according to which British ships arriving and departing from London had to have predominately British crews, this despite the heavy reliance on Indian lascars. In practice this meant that lascars often took up work on vessels on the way to London … but such lascars found themselves stranded without work on getting to London, at times having to become passengers on the return journey. There was also an increasing feeling of rivalry, resentment and conflict on the part of lascars directed towards British officers and crew members on shops, connected to differences in pay and their exploittative use… attempts at reform generated further bureaucract rather than improvement in conditions… The so called ‘Lascar Act’ after the end of the Napoleonic Wars further precluded the legal use of Indian seamen on British vessels. These wider conditions framed the types of insurrections which occured amon lascars in the circuit of country trade between Bombay and the Gulf.”

p. 167 Cora Gooseberry … was an Eora woman.. a term for over 30 clans of Aboriginal people who resided in the Sydney region. She was the widow of Bungaree, who is often said to be the first person called an Australian in print… Both Cora’s remaining breastplates are engraved with fish and this is probably not an accident. It is now know that coastal Eora Aboriginal women played an important role fishing with hooks and lines from their nowie or canoes… with children in tow, while men usually fished with spears from the shore.”

Pages: 1 2

Books Environmental politics History

Notes from The Swallow, A Biography by Stephen Moss

p. 26 Swallows breed across virtually the whole of Europe and Asia, from Ireland in the West, almost as far as the Bering Strait in the east, and south to the southernmost point of China, Hainan ISland – less than 20 degrees north of the equator… western populations mostly migrate to sub-Saharan Africa, while more eastern breeders head down to the Indian sub-continent, south-east Asia and even northern Australia.”

P. 29 So how different are swallows, martins and swifts from one another? By far the easiest to identify is the swift, which is about as closely related to swallows and martins as owls are to kestrels – that is, not at all. Their superficially similar appearance is via the process of convergent evolution, because both swifts and swallows hunt flying insects. Swifts are not passerines at all, but in a completely different order, the Apodiformes. This also includes the hummingbirds, with which they share many physical characteristics and habits. Swifts only come to land when they visit their nests, and even then they struggle… scientific name, Apus apus, means ‘no foot, no foot”. … they are almost entirely sooty-brown (appearing black in most lights) and have long, narrow, curved wings shaped like a scythe; not at all like the triangular wings of the swallows and martins. And while swallos and martins twitter, swifts scream, often rushing across the firmament like jet fighters”.

p. 31 “house martins are easy to identify. They are blue-black above, white below, and with a predominately white rump above a dark, short and slightly forked tail (whereas the swallow’s upperparts are completely blue-black. Overall, as Bill Oddie has pointed out, their colour and patterns bear a strikiung resemblence to a rather larger predator, the killer whale. House martens also nest on the outside of buildings, rather than inside as most barn swallows do.”

p. 32 “swallow is one of just 16 words for birds that occur in Anglo-Saxon literature. In one of the earliest collections of Old English writings, the Epinal-Erfurt Glossary (two manuscrupts compiled for Aldhelm, the Abbot of Malmesbury around the year AD 700) it appears alongside the Latin word Hirundo as “swaluuae”.

p. 72 Like almost all songvirds, the female lays a single egg each day – usually early in the morning – and does not start to incubate until the whole clucth is complete, thus ensuring the chicks will all hatch out at roughly the same time. She incubates the egg for between 13 and 16 days, with no help at all from her mate (in Britain and Europe at least) … But once the chicks hatch – naked, blind and helpless, and each weighing less than 2 grams – the male refeems himself by taking a full part in their feeding. Indeed, of all the world’s 5,000 or more songbirds, male swallows and martins make the greatest contribution to caring for the young.”

p. 73 “bring a bolus (concentrated ball) of a hundred or more insects bac to the nest, sometimes at a rate of one visit every minute”.

Books History Women's history

Notes from A Fool and His Money by Ann Wroe

p. 36 Quicklime for the mortar came from a furnace by the river run by a redoubtable widow, Dona Guizas. Into her courtyard came the peasants from the high plateux, fathers with sons, brothers together, their cards piled high with springing bundles of broom that went to feed the furnace. These bundles were often all the cop their poor fields could produce. Once the lime was burned, ox-carts took it slowly up to town, where it was stored in the basement kitchen of the consuls’ old meeting house… Sometimes the start of a call was attended with grand ceremonial, drinks all round and tops for the builders, as the consuls got their robes muddy laying the first stone; sometimes it was all rushed, grim and businesslike, because the English were expected. …all the time the work was interrupted by the need to deal with suppliers, bickering and thirsty, sweat soaking their hair (the drinks they had to be given were factored into the wall accounts), and by the consuls, whose chief prerogative was to keep chaning their minds.”

p. 37 “At least there was no shortage of labour. In the mornings del Cayro would arrive to find the workers waiting: 14 or 15 regulars from town and, hanging back slightly, countrymen who had walked for miles, or refugees, with bowls and bundled blankets, driven by the mercenaries. In the evenings he would see the pay handed out, sometimes in coin, sometimes in pieces of bacon, to these still nameless folk, while the paymaster flapped and panicked. (“Paid to Master Guilhelm Vigorous, 10 sous, which he gave to the people who worked on the ditch at Bullieyra: which 10 sous are not accounted for, because he got mised up and does not know who he paid them to”.)

p. 52 “Little Elm Tree Square, off the main square of the Bourg. Hectic commerce was going on all round them. Stalls and trader covered almost every inch of ground: butchers, cloth-sellers, cheesemongers, pasty-cooks. … Jugglers and dice-players squatted under the small, battered elm tree that shaded the centre of the square. ..Women wandered about: some with trays of venetables from those steep little plots on the hillside, others, showing an ankle or a shoulder, with better kinds of fruit to sell. Marot and Barbier, perhaps half-naked as they worked, might have shouted some encouragement. But Gasc was middle-aged, with a reputation to sustain; and besides, as a City man, he knew that the low-life on show in the Bourg square was one of the main reasons why the City was nobler, and why he was lucky to live there.”

p. 56 “One had discovered a man on top of a woman as he was crossing the square one night, going through the butchers’ quater. “I don’t know who they were,” he said, “but I think they were committing adultery.” Peyre Massabuou, too, remembered being part of a drinking party, with Guilhem Gaffuer and Johann Ebrart the apothecracy, who bantered with a girl called Guilberta and her friend at La Cadena, in the square, after suppor on the Thursday after Christmas. It cannot have been loitering weather, up in those cold hills, and Peyre’s opening gambit was direct. “Shall we do it with you, or will you do it with us?” “You can’t we’re cousins,” Guilberta told him. Peyre then seized her and, according to Gaffuerm “hugged” her on top of one of the work benches, “but I didn’t see whether he did anything else to her.” Guilberta certainly thought he had.”

p. 89 “The count also policed and organised the town’s join fairs, held every year at the end of November and the end of June. … At the ende of the fairground the meadow was left uncut, full of ox-eye daisies and feathery seedling grass that ran into the old abandoned vines. Respectable merchants… avoided this part, for this was where the prostitutes set up shop. Every so often the count’s officers would drag them out, confiscating their veils and the pouches, hoods, belts and knives of their customers; sometimes th officers would go after pickpockets, or charlatans playing “country games to cheat fairgoers”.

p. 96 “The difference is certainly as clear as day in the tax registers. The City’s balance of payments was in the black continuously between 1350 and 1380, and the Bourg showed only two financial years when it was not in the red. But very few people saw, and nobody would have had the chance to compare, the figures. Perhaps the worsy that the citizens knew of the count in 1370 was that “his people” had unaccountably left a dead mule in the cathedral building office, bloated, stiff and staring, which cost 2 sous 6 deniers (or a workman’s daily wages) to drag out and dispose of.

As for the bishops, these drove citizens mad in a different way. They were not avaricious … and they were not, as the counts could be, consistently careless or cruel; but they were even more consistently absent, and their heads were often in the clouds. Bishop Peyre de Plenacassanha had a library with 130 books in it .. Bishop Bernard d’Albi, in the 1330s, wrote poetry: he could turn out more than 300 lines in an hour, a feat which moved Petrarch (no less!) to tell him that if he carried on at that rate, he would certainly make progress.”

p. 157 “A reputation was a delicate thing. .. there might even be something disreputable about standing still. Country women, for example, stood for hours in the Bourg square holding out smal trays of what they had been able to grow or bake: leeks, apples, cabbages, fresh loaves of brad… But they ran the gamut of people’s suspicions. “I’m not sure whether they’re honest or not,” Johna Monmato had said once. After all, prostitutes (putanas) lingered too, with their wares on display: skirts up round their shins, showing their underskirts, and skimpy veils perched on too much hair.”

p. 158″But when a girl called Vivas and her shoemaker friend went all the way in the church of St Amans, she was the one… who went to the pillory for it. In the same way, when Marguarida, a priest’s servant, “made Father Johan a baby”, it was she who paid the fine – 10 sous – and bore all the disgrace. Possibly something similar had lain behind the case of Galherdeta, handed on the stinking trees for the death of a child.”

p. 181 “Alhunbords… it was the wife who spent money from day to day and had to see that the children were presentable. In this at least she seemed to succeed: nieighbours commented that the children… looked well fed, with proper shoes and tidily combed hair, and that Alhumbords herself managed to keep a good table with salt meat and wine and that enviable sign of sufficiency, “two sorts of bread”, coarse black and white… fresh meat was a luxury. The salt version, with a thick brown rind and a stripe of lean between two laters of flat, was called baco, a word the men of Rodex had borrowed from the English … fruit was costly… a full basket, nicely arranged, took a day’s wages for a skilled man. A tray of eggs cost a third as much; soft cheese, young cantal that could almost be spread like butter, was an expensive present. Rye bread, hard cheese, bacon and greens were what filled most people’s plates”.

p. 182 “there was a royal wholesale tax, a gabelle, on luxury goods… included figs, raisins, almonds, large wax candles, eau-de-vie, pepper and spices… green was the fashion shade of the moment, always mentioned in inventories, and to lose a green coat or a green good was plainly thought worse than losing one of any other colour”.

p. 195 “One court case of 1337 opens a small window … Berengaria (she was not given the courtesy of a surname, being too poor) was once a priest’s servant, doing the cooking and cleaning for the chaplain-curate of St Amans, in the Bourg… Berengaria butted in “He isn’t a good man and he never was. He shut me up one time and locked the door and had laid me.” Astruga told this to the court; her evidence went no further, and it s abruptness suggests a shocked silence greeted the remark… For Berengaria, a priest was a man like any other; and men wanted only one thing.”

p. 197 “The line between priests and laymen was, in fact, very thin, in some ways. Some tonsured clerks were mere children: one, ten years old, was accused of the accidental death of another boy “in a childish game out in the fields, playing darts”. Curates of smaller chirches … had only the flimsiest knowledge of reading, Latin or how to sing the Office; they subsisted on the small offerings for gabbled Masses, and frequently went into partnerships in trade to try to make ends meet”.

Books History Women's history

Notes from Women in Old Norse Society by Jenny Jochens

p. 70

An analysis of the two dozen original Icelandic chivalric sagas reveals that, on the issue of consent at any rate, the authors pictured Europe as divided into two large sections, a northern area stretching roughly halfway down the European continent and including England and Ireland, and a southern area surrounding the Mediterranean’s northern and southern coastlines and also encompassing distant places such as India, which likewise was considered to be Christian. In the north the marriage of a woman was most often decided by her male kin, whereas in the south women were almost always asked about and frequently given full choice of their marriage partners. In the north women demurely accepted their male relatives’ decisions and only occasionally murmured about the suitor being too old or exhibited fear of their fathers.

p. 80

The most unexpected aspect of divorce in the sagas is the latitude given to personal incompatibility, a justification that accorded with the bishop’s permission to grant divorces in similar cases in the law. The discord can be described in vague terms (“they were not alike in temperament;” ) or caused by specific problems (“because of their disagreement”; “their relationship was not good). The blame is occasionally placed on both partners, but more often the husband is at fault. The wife leaves on her own, or is sent back to her father. Sometimes a wife has a sexual complaint, such as Unnr’s famous case of lack of consummation. In other cases no reasons are offered: the reader remains in the dark, for instance, as to why Rannveig left her husband. She adds insult to injury, throwing his clothes into the cesspool, forcing him, girded only in bedclothes, to seek help from a neighbor.

p. 83

After menopause, bereft of reproductive capabilities and perhaps losing sexual attractiveness, older women did not remarry—and often enjoyed their greatest independence as widows. Saga women were frequently admired for qualities normally associated with men. This “gender blurring” was most often expressed by the author, but women themselves also articulated such ideals. Words with a masculine semantic range—“valiant” (drengr) and “forceful” (sk?rungr), for example—characterized numerous men and a few admired women, mostly middle-aged or beyond. Older women no longer inspired fear and jealousy in men, but even the most impressive among these manly and forceful women exercised their authority best in the absence of their husbands. Thus, Þorbjqrg, described as “very forceful” (sk?rungr mikill), “was in charge of the district and made all the decisions when Vermundr [her husband] was not at home”

p. 84

Best known is Auðr/Unnr Ketilsdóttir, the daughter of a Norwegian chieftain and wife of a Norse king in Dublin. Little is known about her until both her husband and son were killed and she became responsible for a large household, including several granddaughters and a grandson. At that moment “she had a ship built secretly in a forest, and when it was completed she loaded it with valuables and prepared for a voyage. She took all her surviving kinsfolk with her. It is generallyagreed that it would be hard to find another example of a woman (kvennmaðr) escaping from such hazards with so much wealth and such a large retinue. From this it can be seen what a paragon amongst women she was.

p. 106

Tacitus praised Germanic mothers for nursing their babies (Germania, chap. 20), and until the advent of modern technology, it was the norm in all traditional societies for children to receive their first nourishment from lactating women. At some point during the late Middle Ages, however, Icelandic mothers came to regard their own milk as inferior. Rather than nursing their children, they gave them cows’ milk and even cream. Even more destructive of their health, children were fed meat and fish, prechewed and thinned with melted butter, from their third or fourth month. The results were disastrous, and Iceland suffered from unusually high infant mortality even by the standards of the seventeenth century, when foreign travelers first brought attention to the problem and identified malnutrition as the cause.

p. 114

According to Landndmab6k, the first generation of named settlers contained nearly six times as many men as women. Given this imbalance, it is remarkable that almost three-quarters of the men in this first cohort managed to establish families. Nearly two-thirds of these, however, were identified only by the name of the father and his children with no indication of whether he was a widower or of the children’s legal status. Who were these unknown women who produced the first generation of native Icelanders? One intriguing proposition is that they were Irish slaves whose names were suppressed because their ancestry was not worthy of comment and added little luster to the family. These Celtic women may have contributed their distinct genes to the Icelandic melting pot, with important biological consequences.

p. 130

Men used their leisure time—grouped according to an ascending scale of social importance—to be bored or lazy, to sleep while others worked, to engage in sports and games, to tell stories, to drink and jest, to indulge their grief by composing poetry or luxuriating in bed, and to participate in the politics of the island. Women shared only few of these activities and are often depicted as working while men played. Women are rarely seen socializing among themselves without working at the same time, and Þórðr’s statement likely did not hold true for society as a whole. Women, in fact, worked longer and harder than men, although because women were not central to the sagas’ focus on feuding and politics, the authors regularly diminished the role and status of females

p. 132

Although women spent less time in bed, they also slept more lightly and fretfully, awakening at the slightest provocation and frequently becoming aware of troubles before men. When a man comes secretly to a farm late at night and steals embers from the fire, only a woman is alert. When a hostile party quietly arrives during the night, a woman is the first to notice. As a wealthy widow, it is not proper for Þórelfr to go to the door herself when someone knocks late at night, but she is the first to hear. Asking a male servant to respond, she, characteristically, has trouble rousing him.

p. 157

Work was conditioned by the social status of both genders. The lower a woman’s position, the harder her work, which doubtless included, male tasks. It is perhaps no accident that the only recorded case of odor from perspiration due to physical work came from a female slave ( 6.27:85). In the everyday world of the sagas women were, in fact, involved in practically all outdoor tasks, including animal husbandry. Except for milking, animals were normally tended by men; cattle and sheep may have been relatively small in Iceland, but they could be strong and dangerous. Male shepherds were therefore normally in charge of the pastures, but an occasional shepherdess can be found. A very young girl (meystelpa) in charge of cattle belonging to two brothers, for example, was bullied by their neighbor. Women and young girls also helped men drive animals and herd them into pens. A woman supervised the task of channeling a stream under the house. The law specified as male tasks the pulling ashore (skipsdráttr) and launching (framdráttr) of a boat. All farmers from the neighborhood were to appear with their workmen (húskarlar), but one saga episode shows women from the shipowner’s farm pulling with the men.

p. 159

Saturday was variously referred to as “bath day” (laugardagr) or “laundry day” (þváttdagr). Hot water made it possible to wash clothes year round, thus facilitating the apparent custom of a wife presenting her husband and sons with clean shirts on Sunday morning. As suggested by this detail and confirmed by episodes depicting women washing linen out of doors, washing was a female task

p. 163 Until the middle of the fourteenth century, when a new fashion, perhaps inspired from men’s plate armor, created the inserted sleeve and replaced the older T-shaped style, sleeves were wide, and since they were rarely buttoned, they needed to be sewn close to the wrists to provide maximum warmth and freedom to work. This task was performed by women morning and night.

p. 164

Scarcity of grain meant that in Iceland, unlike in continental Europe, bread never became a staple. It was in fact so rare that people dreamt about it, and one man received the nickname “Butter-Ring” (sm j?rhringr) from his favorite food of bread and butter. Scarcity of grain and ovens made fiat bread the preferred form in most of the north, but even in this form it never became important in the Icelandic diet. Grain was instead diluted in gruel and porridge

p. 166  Heavily salted, butter could be kept for decades; large stores were accumulated, like gold, by wealthy landowners. By the time of the Reformation the bishopric in Hólar possessed a mountain of butter calculated to weigh twenty-five tons.

p. 167

Cooking followed techniques and employed utensils that changed little over time. A comparison between the kitchen equipment buried with the woman entombed in the Oseberg burial in Norway in August or September 834 and the house-hold recommendations of 1585 by the Swedish Count Per Brahe for his wife shows remarkable little change over a span of seven centuries.

p. 174

The female role in Icelandic material culture is highlighted by the importance and ubiquitous presence of homespun (vaðmdl) produced from sheep’s fleece. Clothing the entire population from cradle to grave and even occasionally protecting sick animals, homespun was also used for bedding, sails, wall-hangings, packs, and sacks of all kinds. Most impressive, it replaced silver as the standard commodity against which other products were evaluated within Iceland. As the country’s exclusive export, it procured necessities and luxuries only available abroad. The result, the unique system of “the homespun standard,” governed Icelandic economic life for centuries.

p. 183  One of the less apparent but important products was sails. Women’s role in supplying this fundamental prerequisite for the viking expeditions is vouchsafed by Óttarr the Black (svarti), an eleventh-century Icelandic skald who refers to “sails…spun by women.” A more tangible illustration is the “good long-ship sail” (langskipssegl gott) that Þórólfr brings the Norwegian king as a present from his father Skalla-Grímr. The Norwegian Speculum Regale recommends, as a matter of course, that large amounts of homespun (vaðmál) be stored on ships together with needles and thread for the reparation of sails. The spectacular Norwegian ship burials confirm these literary references to woolen sails.

p. 209

in a general medieval context, the Norse world was profoundly patriarchal. As my analysis of widows indicated, the human ideal that was most admired and to which both men and women aspired was more masculine than feminine. Carol Clover has suggested that the social binary of nordic society was not male/female, but a different sort of polarity: on one hand, a group of people consisting of most able-bodied men and a few outstanding women known for their exceptional mental strength and overpowering personalities, and, on the other, a kind of “rainbow coalition” of the rest of humanity, including most of the women, children, slaves, the old and disabled, and disenfranchised men. The few women found in the first group were identified in terms normally associated with men. Most of them were older women who had gained in material and social assets what they had lost in sexual attractiveness. Whereas the debility of old age might disqualify a man from the admired category, women were never expected to fight and age did not therefore affect their worth. Moreover, since exceptionality was measured in male terms, a capable woman was obviously most advantageously placed to demonstrate her worth in the absence of a husband. It is therefore not surprising that the narratives reveal a number of imposing women in the permanent stage of widowhood, between marriages, or in control of authority while their husbands were away.

p. 213

Tacitus was impressed by the dignity and equality ordinary women derived from Germanic marriage (Germania, chap. 18–19). His brief description of the sharing of property, brought as gifts by the bride and the groom from their respective families, provides the first glimpse into the commercial foundations of the Germanic marriage. His version corresponds well with the reports of Continental laws in the second half of the  first millennium and with the numerous details culled from Icelandic and Norwegian laws dating from the beginning of the next.

p. 216

The silent pagan bride, transferred  like property from father to husband, was replaced by the articulate Christian woman who by her own “yes-word” (jáyrði) was allowed to affirm her willingness to share her life with a man who already had consulted her, not just her father. Fathers of daughters may have appreciated this new female freedom, but it was not necessarily received with favor by the groom or his kinsmen, who were more preoccupied with the economic and political advantages offered by the bride and her family than with personal relations. One may further speculate that affective marriages—that is, marriages containing mutual marital affection—were encouraged when a woman had given her consent.

p. 217

With a weekly day of rest and numerous feast days, the Christian calendar clearly afforded more respite from work than the few seasonal celebrations of the pagan year. The medieval woman, nevertheless, worked as hard as her ancient sister, and she, too, went to bed exhausted by her labors. Her satisfaction, however, may have been less. Whereas the housewife in the ancient setting worked with the resources available on her farm to feed and clothe her family, the economic success of the new system of wool export entailed increased management, which most certainly fell under male control.

Books History

Notes from The Shortest History of England by James Hawe

In England, and only in England, they entirely replaced the culture they found. This is England’s founding uniqueness. It explains why the modern English find their immediate neighbour-language, Welsh, utterly strange, yet can still almost understand German swearing from around 850ad: hundes ars in tino naso, meaning (of course) hound’s arse in thine nose.

So why did the Germanic migrants only stay Germanic in England? Partly, it was because Britannia had already declined and fallen into a land run by local warlords whom Gildas calls tyrants. All the incoming English found were ruins – and seeing nothing worth adopting, they stuck to their own culture. They could do so because of the other vital difference: the sea.

The Channel didn’t protect Britannia: it made total conquest possible. Elsewhere in Europe, the Germanic conquerors were all-male war-bands. An entire tribe – old people, nursing mothers, small children and all – couldn’t survive long overland journeys through hostile territory. The English, though, could ship whole clans across to the Saxon Shore in a day or two, landing at well-built, long-familiar Roman ports.

Everywhere else, the single male Germanic warriors intermarried with local women, so the Latinate languages – and Christianity – survived. The English brought their own women-folk with them, so they stayed English pagans.

It’s clear that in Wessex, the Romano-British resisted enough to cut genuine deals with the English at the highest level. Several names in the royal Wessex genealogy sound distinctly Celtic: 15Cerdic, Caedwalla, Cenwahl, Caelin. The first great English historian, the Venerable Bede (d.735ad), comments that Caelin (who led his tribe to a great victory over what sound like Gaelic warlords at Dryham, near Bath, in 577ad) was known in the speech of his own people – i.e. perhaps the native waelisce – as Ceaulin. Remarkably, the laws of King Ine of Wessex (c.700ad) survive, showing that he ruled over two cultures: the waelisce were generally second-class citizens, but they were still protected by law and some were major landowners, classed even above landowning English freemen (only 5-10% of the English ever actually owned land). Most strikingly of all, Ine could call on the cyninges horswealh, which translates neatly as The King’s Welsh Horse. At Lady Mary Church in Wareham, the evidence for the survival of prosperous Romano-Britons is set in stone: five memorials, inscribed with lettering clearly Celtic in origin, dating from as much as 350 years after the start of the English conquest. So the Romano-British of lowland Britannia were neither killed nor driven out. Instead, led by their elites, they adopted Englishness – and eventually the language – from the top down. Almost from the start, English identity wasn’t a racial fate, but a political choice – a hard choice, no doubt, but a choice

By 601ad Ethelbert had given in to Augustine, or the Franks, or his wife, and converted. He now set down the laws of his lands in writing. They stress the privileged position of the Church in society, and lay down in great detail the fines for various acts of rape and violence (12 shillings for cutting off an ear; 50 shillings for knocking out an eye; 12 shillings for having sex with a nobleman’s maid – but only 6 shillings if she is a commoner’s maid). Here is civilisation coming in at ground zero.

These laws were written in English. This was unique: all the continental Germanic nations wrote down their laws in the prestige-language, Latin. In England, almost nobody spoke Latin anymore, so the everyday language was, from the dawn of literacy, given the awesome privilege of being written down. Until the Norman Conquest, the English, alone in Western Europe, were ruled in their own tongue.

St Boniface (c.675-754) led a counter-invasion of the old English homelands in 18Germany: still able to talk to the Germans without a translator, he made good progress before winning martyrdom. Alcuin of York became the most trusted political advisor to Charlemagne. Astonishingly, their personal correspondence survives, showing how the English churchman advised the great Frankish king during his restoration of the Roman Empire in 800ad.

The practice of furnished burials came to an abrupt end in the ad 670s-680s. The disappearance of these rites coincided exactly with Theodore of Tarsus’s period as primate… a far more radical shift in burial practice among the general population than previously considered possible.

Somehow, Alfred’s Wessex had a unique resilience, perhaps because it had been born as an almost equal, law-based fusion of invading English and resident Romano-British elites. The memories of rural people easily span a mere couple of centuries.3 It may be that Alfred of the Cerdicingas (as the Wessex royal family styled itself ) was able to call, at the vital moment, on older, deeper loyalties than other English kings.

Much of the North and East felt more kinship with the Vikings than with the Wessex dynasty. This made an effective national resistance impossible. Instead, the Vikings were paid danegelds to go away. Unsurprisingly, they came back for more. Appeasement corrupted English society because Aethelred used his favourites as tax-gatherers, and they took their own cut: no more danegelds, no more cut. Small wonder the Chronicle for these years repeatedly laments that plans to confront the Danes were undone by treachery.

Aethelred did make one bold strategic move, and it set wheels in motion that would decide the fate of English England. The Danish raiders often used ports belonging to Duke Richard of Normandy, whose own Viking ancestors had settled there only 90 years before. To bring the Normans onside, Aethelred married Richard’s sister, Emma of Normandy, in 1002.

His Norman alliance secured, Aethelred tried to solve England’s Danish problem. In November 1002, he ordered the massacre of all the Danish men who were among the English race.4 It backfired spectacularly because one of the dead was the sister of Sweyn, King of Denmark. Raiding England now became official Danish state policy, and the cost of the danegelds spiralled.

For the next decade and more, the English were robbed, under the guise of legal process, in courts run by Normans where the natives were only allowed to answer specific questions and had to use translators. The Domesday Book (1087) – named by the English themselves, because (it was said) you had no more chance of disputing it than you would have on Judgement Day itself – set it all down. By William’s death, only about 5% of England remained in English hands.

The lack of resistance by the English, who outnumbered the Normans by about a hundred to one, bewildered the invaders. 40Two early Anglo-Norman historians, both with English mothers, shook their heads in disbelief. William of Malmesbury (c.1095-1143) wrote of miserable provincials… so feeble that they failed after the first battle to seriously rise up and make an attempt for their freedom. Ordericus Vitalis (1075-c.1142) depicts the English as interested only in feasting and drinking, caring nothing for freedom.

Luckily for English pride, however, there are good reasons.

  1. THE NORTH-SOUTH DIVIDE. No English leader except, briefly, Athelstan, had ever been able truly to mobilise the whole country.
  2. LACK OF NATURAL REDOUBTS. Most of Southern England was near-perfect country for the invincible new Norman cavalry.
  3. NO FUNCTIONING NATIVE ELITE. The English elite had been corrupted by Aethelred, Danified by Cnut, decimated at Hastings, and had finally fled the country in c.1076.
  4. THE MEDIEVAL WARM PERIOD. By 1100 the skeletons of ordinary Englishmen were distinctly taller than in 1000. No peasantry rebels if their bellies and barns are full.
  5. THE CHURCH. It alone had given Anglo-Saxon England any real unity. Now, it was fully on the side of the Normans.
  6. CIVILISATION. The English had lived through decades of blood-boltered Anglo-Danish politics. Even after the Conquest, Earl Waltheof was still having rival Englishmen murdered as they sat down to dinner. The Chronicle itself, though listing William’s acts of brutality and greed, reminded English readers that betwixt other things is not to be forgotten that good peace which he maked in this land. Any king who maintained law and order was better than what had gone before.

With Eleanor’s treasure backing him, Henry crossed the Channel. In July 1153 his army faced Stephen’s across the Thames at Wallingford, but there was no fight. Chivalric deterrence operated in 12th-century Europe: the heavy cavalry charge was matchless when it came to mowing down hapless foot-soldiers, but if steel-clad horsemen met head-on at a combined speed of over 40mph, the result was mutual aristocratic destruction. The Church brokered a deal: Stephen would keep the throne but Henry would inherit.

By 1180, the English elite had refashioned themselves in the image of their masters by making the great leap of adopting French language and culture. This is typical of what happens in a colony. 

De Montfort allowed the captive Henry to remain king, with all decisions subject to approval by Parliament. But when Prince Edward escaped and gathered an army of disaffected nobles, he was doomed. At the Battle of Evesham on 4 August 1265, the chivalric values of the age were suspended. De Montfort had dared to enlist the common people: now he was treated as a common rebel, and targeted by a 12-man hit-squad who 65hacked him to pieces. Virtually all his followers were slaughtered on the spot. Henry III himself, a prisoner in de Montfort’s ranks, was almost killed by accident because he wasn’t wearing the badge Prince Edward had chosen to mark out his own men – the St. George’s Cross. The national banner of England was born at the defeat of the first man who’d appealed in English to the English since 1066.

The following year, after the failed Epiphany Rising, supporters of the deposed Richard II (still alive in captivity) fled to Cirencester. The gang included some of the highest nobles in the land. In previous generations, awe of the Normans might have cowed the townspeople. But now the Englishmen of Cirencester grabbed their bows and pinned the aristocrats indoors all night with a hail of arrows. The next day, defying orders to bring the rebels before the king for judgement, the Gloucestershire men led the captured aristocrats ignominiously away on foot, while they themselves rode their horses. Then they smoot of the lordis heddis. For the first time since Durham in 1069, a company of fully-armed aristocrats had been defied, defeated and slaughtered by English commoners.

Shrewsbury on 21 July 1403 It was the most important battle on English soil since 1066, and the history of the nation turned on tiny differences in the flights of two arrows. For the first time, the English used their fearsome longbows on each other. Henry Hotspur, son of the Earl of Northumberland, was killed, and with his death his army lost heart. Prince Hal – the future Henry V – was pierced beneath his eye, but stayed on the field until victory was won. Five or six inches of the arrow stuck fast in his skull for weeks. He was eventually saved, in a near-miraculous operation, by the surgeon John Bradmore.

English unity had been saved, but the price was a serious transfer of power to Parliament. Henry had needed its support to get through the crisis, and MPs took their chance: in 1406, the Lords and Commons sat for a record 139 days, including the first ever all-night sitting, and forced the King to subject even his household expenditure to inspection. Henry desperately tried to revive the royal authority in the traditional way – war with France – but his campaigns were abject failures. Sick and worn out, he died in 1413, having caught his son trying on the crown while he was (just) still alive.

War of the Roses The wars caused surprisingly little damage to the English economy. For a century beforehand, the English had done all their fighting in France. Warriors on both sides knew that the castles and towns of England had hopelessly outdated defences, so instead of retreating behind walls, they chose to settle things in the open field. As a result, aristocrats had fallen like nine-pins but there had been no great sieges, little laying-waste of the countryside, and not much interruption of trade. 

Two years later, in 1485, the second-last successful invasion of England set out from Harfleur on 1 Aug, landing at Milford Haven in Wales. Henry was part-Welsh, which meant he had two out of the three power blocs of the Tripartite Indenture of 1405 in his pocket: it was now the South and the Welsh against the North. When the forces met at Bosworth, Richard saw his allies wavering. He risked all on a direct personal charge at Henry, who took cover amidst his French mercenaries until Richard’s key commander, Sir William Stanley, made the vital decision to turn his coat. 

Henry VII wasn’t just Welsh: he was as self-consciously European as any medieval king. He had spent the past 14 years in France, and modelled himself on modern French royal taste. That meant Renaissance Humanism, whose signature was a new, rational statecraft (as described by Niccolo Machiavelli) in which kings were to be served and guided by an elite who had studied the Classics.

For the next 400 years, the entire English upper class was expected to have good French, decent Latin and a smattering of Ancient Greek. Anyone who could speak only English was proletarian, hoi polloi, not comme il faut – and if you didn’t understand those insults, well, it just went to show. Oxford and Cambridge demanded both Ancient Greek and Latin from all applicants until 1919, with Latin still required until 1960.