Category Archives: Politics

Environmental politics

Green observations

Apologies for the silence – have been doing a very busy “one-day, one-city” work run through Paris, Nuremberg, Hamburg, Paris and Autun … don’t worry, all by the wonderful European train network. It is just amazing that you can confidently plan to arrive in a city two hours before you are due to deliver a talk and be sure that there won’t be a problem.

Also very impressed by the arrangements for rubbish on German trains – separate recycling bins for paper, glass and packaging, and there’s clearly an expectation that everyone will use them.

Also impressed to see many cyclists of all ages and attires in the German cities, although less keen on the fact that cycle provision is almost entirely taken from pedestrian space – the cars are left to speed free. (Which when you are a visitor makes walking feel a little hazardous, although the locals obviously rub along well enough.)

Was taken by Frankfurt train station, definitely the least “chain-stored” one I’ve seen in Europe – beyond the Body Shop, Burger King and what was probably a chain newspaper store, everything else looked like little local shops. (And the Thai there – run by real Thais, is definitely to be recommended – and adding to the cultural mix I used Thai to order, since I wasn’t doing too well guessing at the German). Although I’m puzzled as to why there’s a stall there selling surgical instruments – I can’t actually think why I’d want to buy a stethoscope at a train station.

Talking of transport, for those who think there’s something “green” about Australia, a shocking statistic: there are suburbs in Melbourne where only one out of 100 people use public transport to get to work.

Feminism History

Only for Homo erectus…

The Musee Terra-Amata is curiously located at the foot of a standard huge apartment block overlooking the port of Nice, somewhere that humans have been gathering for a long time, for it was here, now some distance from the sea but then the shore, that a group of Homo erectus – hunters of young elephants and rhinos particularly camped, probably for a number of seasons.

The museum is on the very spot where their camp was found, complete with what must have claim to being the oldest wall in the world, a small stretch perhaps 50cm high that was the foundation for a wooden framework. They weren’t very tidy, these erectuses – the site is scattered with discarded tools, human coprolites, and the inside of the shelter was scattered with discarded bones – presumably throwing your bones out of the hut wasn’t required etiquette. There’s even one (not very distinct) footprint. Most of the tools are basic, but one of them is rather fine…

006

Once again, though, I found my feminist hackles rising, for this is the image used to illustrate the replica of the site…

002

You might notice there’s something missing – women. All of the figures are male – based so far as I can see on no evidence whatsoever. Sure this was, as we understand, a hunting camp, but I don’t know about any evidence of sexual division of labour among erectus.

The other thing that I was left puzzled by was the purpose of the “shelter”. Certainly, as reconstructed upstairs, it wouldn’t keep out rain or wind; maybe it would serve as a certain barrier to dangerous predators – but really what would it achieve for the amount of effort required? There are several apparent heaths in and around it, but I couldn’t help wondering if it might have supported some kind of hide cover – although I don’t think it would generally be thought that erectus was that far advanced.

011

Books Feminism Women's history

What happened to 2m ‘surplus’ women?

I should have loved Virginia Nicholson's Singled Out. I love reading about, and then getting to write about in reviews like this one, women pioneers, women successes, women who beat all of the odds. And there are hundreds of stories like that here: Beatrice Gordon Holmes, suffragette, founder of the Association of Shorthand Writers and Typists, and tremendously successful city businesswoman; the middle-class young lady Victoria Alexandrina Drummond, who against fervent opposition became a marine engineer and in 1940 worked her ship to safety and won the Lloyd's war medal for bravery at sea; Mary Milne, who became matron of St Mary's Paddington, known, unusually for a woman in that role, for her sympathetic handling of trainees and junior staff.

But there are two reasons why, while glad to have read it, I thought that Singled Out was as a book something less as a whole than the sum of its parts. One isn't, perhaps, Nicholson's fault. She charts, fairly enough, the astonishing public hostility against these women – the Daily Mail figures prominently here; Lord Northcliffe, its owner, publicly referred to "Britain's problem with two million superfluous women". Plus ca change… Then there are authors such as Walter M Gallichan, who in The Great Unmarried (1916) wrote of the "modern woman":

Ideas are seething in her busy little brain. She is desperately intellectual. One day she tells you that she is prepared to die for the cause of Women's Suffrage. Next week she will be immersed in economics, or vegetarianism, or free love… 'I don't mean to marry,' she says, with a ring of disdain/ 'I want to live my own life…. She tried to disguise her sex attractions by dressing dowdily, neglecting her hair, wearing square-toed boots, and assuming inelegant poses.

It is souring to read such stuff; women being blamed for being in circumstances that were no choice of their own (they hadn't even had the choice of the politicians who took Britain into the war). You can't help getting angry (and reminded of all of the similar junk still thrown around today, often in the same places). Maybe there needed to be a taster here, but perhaps there's more than is needed.

The second problem is clearly Nicholson's – one of structure. There isn't a very clear one: we swing back and forth from the working classes to the privileged, revisit some women several times, such as the hugely impressive archaeologist Gertrude Caton-Thompson and the writer Vera Brittain, but I never really had a sense of where we were going, or why. And I'm not quite sure why we have to visit the horror of the trenches in the first chapter. Certainly, this was reflected back to the women, but surely that could come through their stories, rather than the men's.

Nonetheless, there's a lot to admire here – and particularly the oral histories, which Nicholson has captured at the last possible moment (many of her interviewees being around the 100 mark). She's great at painting short pictures of ordinary, extraordinary lives, such as that of Olive Wakeham, born in 1907, who spent much of her career as a nursery nurse, since her family couldn't pay for teacher training, was the centre of the lives of many of her 28 first cousins, then ended up as president of the Devon County Association for the Blind, and an MBE.

Then there's Evelyn Symmonds, who got her first job in 1922 at the age of 14, in the Post Office making her a "Civil Servant", a source of pride, then she was gradually promoted, passing exams despite very basic education, and after 30 years was an executive officer in the Accountant General's Department, retiring at 60 after 45 years in the post office. She told Nicholson: "We used to on holidays and please ourselves. We had good money, and I loved my job. I've thoroughly enjoyed life, I must admit…"

And the stark facts of the story are powerful in themselves. In 1911 there were already 664,000 more women than men in Britain – because girl babies are tougher and men were more likely to emigrate to the colonies. And in 1917 you can only admire both the courage and the clearsightedness of the senior mistress of the Bournemouth High School for Girls who stood before the assembled sixth form and told them: "Only one out of ten of you girls can ever hope to marry. This is not a guess of mine. It is a statistical fact. Nearly all of the men who might have married you have been killed. You will have to make your way in the world as best you can." By the 1921 census her words were born out – there were 19,803,022 women in England and Wales and only 18,082,220 males. And this in a world where at the turn of the century less than 30% of women had jobs – and virtually all of these in the traditional housework, childcare or factory roles.

read more »

Feminism

Sex and space

A post on Comment is Free about sex work has topped the 1,000-comments mark, and (perhaps not typically) for its depth, knowledge and thougtfulness, deserved all the attention. It is from a sex worker, and she not only neatly points out the extraordinary methological flaws on a recent, much-reported study (if you ask brothels the age of their workers, do you really believe the answers?), but explains why she chose sex work, and why she doesn’t want this option taken away from her.

Also at the Guardian, a fascinating piece about how urban design is done by men, for men.

Books Environmental politics History

So do you reckon it will rain today?

I've lived in three flats in London that have led me into regular, if short, contact with large numbers of neighbours whom I've barely got to know. Consequently, I've got very good at talk about the weather (although I remain extremely bad at predicting it.) The British talk about the weather, a lot, perhaps because theirs is so changeable, but also because they are such a polite race – politics, religion, etc are all distinctly "out".

And it seems from Jan Golinski's work that it was ever thus. In British Weather and the Climate of Enlightenment, he finds, however, that from the Enlightenment onwards, about the end of the 17th century, there was a significant change in the way in which people talked about the weather — or at least how educated people talked about it. Extreme events came to be regarded less as acts of god and more as natural phenomena to be explained (although as Golinski notes in the conclusion, even today, as in some discussion about Hurricane Katrina, some haven't managed to reach the stage of basic enlightenment).

As you might expect, the change was founded on science, or at least attempted science, which can be traced back to the efforts of the Royal Society in the 1660s. Robert Hooke published his "Method for Making a History of the Weather" in 1667, laying out the format that a daily journal should take. A few recorders, who more or less followed these methods – meticulously in the case of William Derham – were published in the Society's Philosophical Transactions. In the 1780s British efforts, which had been sporadic, were sharpened by efficient "competition" from France and Germany.

The efforts took a more popular form in The Gentleman's Magazine, which from 1751 began monthly accounts from the London physician John Fothergill, while later Thomas Barker in Rutland and the famous naturalist Gilbert White (whose The Natural History of Selbourne has just been republished) also contributed.

The notion of climate had, Golinski records, once meant simply a zone of latitude and later extended to mean the conditions of a place, including its atmosphere. Classical writers, including Caesar and Tacitus, had begun a familiar refrain about the British damp, but during the Enlightenment period, the trope gradually shifted: the weather was part of what made Britain great.- moderate and only gently variable in temperature and precipitation – indeed "civilised".

Studying the weather in the 18th century meant doing so politely – having a cultural marker that set you off from the common mass – John Pointer dismissed claims that storms represented armies fighting in the air as "barbarous" or "vulgar". Another commentator complained that "in the last Century it as …a prevailing Opinion among the Vulgar that the Winds were in some measure, under the direction of the internal spirits". Appropriate records and scientific investigation and explanation could, these men (and they were nearly all men – Margaret Mackenzie of Delvine, Perthshire, who kept a meticulous temperature record at her home from 1780 to 1802 being a rare exception about whom Golinski unfortunately tells us no more) banish such misunderstandings.

Although, of course, the science was far from up to the job. The great summer haze of 1783 cause, we now know, by a dust and gas plume from a volcanic fissure in Iceland, was beyond 18th-century science's powers of explanation, although Benjamin Franklin did get it right, but it seems no one believed him. One newspaper called it a "universal Perturbation in Nature".

While this is clearly a solidly grounded academic work, Golinski provides plenty of colour to leaven his account, which is interesting enough in its own terms (and he's blessed short on academic jargon). So he tells us about Thomas Barker (1722-1809), squire of Lyndon Hall in the county of Rutland, who took his dedication to weather recording, as to other scientific experiments. "Twice a day, month after month, year after year, Barker read his thermometer and barometer, at times that he measure to the minute…" There were however occasional interruptions, as on his marriage in 1751 to the sister of Gilbert White. His recording here was less meticulous, however: he wrote in his diary "at Selbourne, etc". (What Anne White thought or perhaps wrote about the marriage unfortunately doesn't seem to have survived.)
read more »

Politics

There’s a lot of work to do in Brighton Pavilion

Conveniently PoliticsHome in its survey of marginal seats has chosen to make it the example.

The core conclusions on voter preference:

Conservative 31%, Labour 28%, Liberal Democrat 15%, Green 22%, Other 3%
* 58% of respondents said they would definitely vote, in line with similar seats and marginal seats as a whole (59%).
* 22% of respondents said they would be voting tactically, higher than in most other seats (16%).
* 23% of voters had definitely made up their mind how to vote, 37% said it was possible or likely they would change their mind. This is considerably more volatile than most other seats.
55% of respondents said party image was most important to them in deciding how to vote, higher than average (45%).
Only 4% said the local candidate was the most important factor, lower than on average (8%).

The summary of the national result can be found here.