Category Archives: Environmental politics

Environmental politics

A reminder that politics can be fun

There’s nothing like a good old political spat. In the New Statesman:

Sian Berry comments on the Tory “green” policy, announced amidst much fanfare.

Zac Goldsmith takes the criticism personally.

Then Sian comes back.

Possibly to be continued…

(Of course it is all serious really – I fear lots of people are thinking that the Tories are gonig green, helped by the patent “ungreeness” of the current governemnt – but you need some entertainment occasionally. If you keep contemplating the seriousness of it all, all of the time, it just becomes too depressing – it took me a fortnight to recover from reading The Revenge of Gaia.)

Environmental politics

Pleasant American surprises

It is easy to think of America as the land of Hummer-driving, ginormous burger-eating environmental vandals, but of course there are good green things happening there. The Economist this week has two interesting accounts:

* the first big concentrating solar power plant since the 80s (who says solar isn’t a “mature technology”?) has just been opened in Nevada.

* there’s apparently (by the Economist’s judgement anyway) a boom in green building. What that it were the same in Britain – whenever I catch the train those hideous quasi-Georgian brick boxes packed on the outskirts of towns and villages make me despair.

Environmental politics

Recycling is not good enough

Slowly, far too slowly, the multinationals are being forced to notice environmental campaigns. The Independent reports:

Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, which between them account for 55 per cent of the global soft drinks and mineral water market, have vowed to overhaul their operations to recover and recycle the billions of plastic containers used to sell their products worldwide…
Coca-Cola announced last week that it intended to recycle all its plastic bottles in the US within five years. A £30m recycling plant will be built in South Carolina with a capacity to handle two billion bottles a year with similar facilities planned for Austria, Mexico and the Philippines.

You might think I’d say “good”, but I won’t. Recycling was a simple first step that got people involved in “going green”, but once you build that £30m plant there’ll be enormous pressure to run it at full capacity. Instead, much better would be to first reduce the number of bottles used (promotion of good ol’ tap water would be a good start), and then resuse bottles, rather than recycling them. And the only way that latter is going to happen is by governments showing just a tinsy bit of courage.

Environmental politics

It isn’t rocket science

… just technology a century and a half old, and it is called the bicycle. Cycling England has calculated that “making a £70m annual investment in cycling initiatives the government could cut up to 54m car journeys a year by 2012 and reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 35,000 tonnes”.

But to really make it happen, what you have to do is go back not quite to the start of the bicycle, but certainly the best part of a century, and make the roads, at least the small city and suburban roads, do what they were originally designed to do – get people around by foot and slow transport (then animal, now bicycle), and made motor vehicles a highly restricted, rare form of transport, used only when strictly necessary, for the disabled and for transport of goods that can’t practically be carried any other way.

Environmental politics

A small step forward

I see today that the Organic Delivery Company (who are pretty good, BTW, I get my weekly fruit and veg box from them), are now refilling the bottles of at least some of the Ecover products, such as the laundry liquid. Reuse: so much better than recycling.

Blogging/IT Environmental politics

Back from conference, with a surprise

Back from conference, and thanks to Sue for the tip, I learnt that this blog has been named by Iain Dale as one of the Top Ten Underrated Blogs – that was on Wednesday – so I picked a great time, it would seem, to disappear into the wifi-less depths of Liverpool Hope University for the Green Party conference.

But I do have some good excuses for going quiet here – I think I can say without being unduly immodest that one of the highlights of the conference was the panel that I organised on Women Left Behind, which focused on women suffering from double disadvantages – of gender, and of being from ethnic minority communities, being asylum-seekers and refugees, and of being sex workers. The three speakers did a spectacular job, and held the hall spellbound – and Matt did a fine job of writing that report, so I won’t rehearse it here – do go over and check out the link.

But getting together three speakers, from Maidstone, London and Sheffield respectively, and assembling them all for a noon session was fraught with tension… might do it again in the autumn – the memories of the stress level will have faded a bit by then.

My other main policy contribution was on women’s income, pensions, savings and debt. I had been hoping to get a Fawcett Society speaker on that, but it didn’t work out, so instead I used its extensive research for a presentation within a fringe meeting on basic income, which actually worked out as a very good blend. Basic income – Green Party policy that everyone should be automatically paid an income sufficient on which to live, if frugally – has fascinating possibilities, but as I was thinking about the contribution it drove home how income is only a part of our financial position – all of those other things are important.

And a contribution from the floor raised an interesting question. Basic income would also be paid to children, but to whom would it be paid? Giving it to mothers would do what the current benefits system does – reinforce traditional gender stereotypes. But worldwide research shows that women tend to spend household income on their children, rather than themselves, far more than do men. It is a tricky question, and one that demonstrates the value of such informal discussions in working through policy.