After Britain and France’s “race riots”, it is now Australia’s turn, or at least so a simplistic analysis would have it.

The ignition point in Sydney was access to and use of a beach. Two surf lifesavers were beaten up by some men from a Muslim background who had been told to stop play soccer, and then the conflict was off. The site of the start of the problem was Cronulla and other southern beaches of Sydney – which will be familiar to anyone who’s read the novel Puberty Blues, or seen the film, and the misogynistic, tribal world they portray.

I lived in Sydney for the first 20 years of my life and never visited one of those places – Sydney is a very spread-out place, and very divided. But it was generally agreed the image the novel presented was accurate, and I doubt much has changed.

They’ll know that even among the white tribes of the southern beaches (estimated to be 90 pre cent-plus Anglo-Celtic) conflict was common. But when the “Westies” (from the poorer, far more ethnically mixed inland suburbs) try to assert their right to the public space, the conflict is likely to be even more heated.

It is probably true that race is only peripheral. Both sides have absorbed the often-destructive masculine-dominated theory of “mateship”. And that’s the real fuel.

This SMH piece is the best analysis I’ve seen.

I spent this afternoon in the company of some amazing objects, prime among them a 10.5m-long, broad and solid-looking boat. A Bronze Age boat. That’s right, a boat well over 2,000 years old, hewn from a single massive oak.

What’s more, unlike most such finds, which come out of bogs, so have spent much of their life buried, this came into the British Museum in the 19th century, when it was found being used as a bridge.

And it looks like a piece of old oak, maybe a couple of hundred years old.

The amazing thing is that no one has done any significant research on it, because there aren’t the funds. The hope is one day an interested PhD student will come along … sounds like a good idea to me!

Researching around it, I found there is something even more amazing in Dover, a sea-going Bronze Age boat. (Which I really have to see.) And the a pretty spectacular one from Fiskerton.

This was on a behind-the-scenes tour – I also saw the new icon room, of which the Prehistory and Europe Department (which is responsible for around two-thirds of the 6.5m – approx. – items in the museum). It is a brilliant setup in that the icons can be studied on slide-out trays, so that they don’t have to be moved at all.

There’s also a small but spectacular collection of European armour – including a helmet that consensus thought was probably of the Agincourt era (complete with the straw/raffia – not sure of the proper term – padding).

… Then back to reality. I spent an inordinate amount of time in the post office trying to post the Christmas stuff. You have to wonder, are they trying to put themselves out of business?

As I walk up Tottenham Court Road, accosted on all side by the wielders of brochures for cheap international phone calls, “PC modding*”, “mobile phone unlocking”, and other obscure goods and services I’m unlikely to ever to use, should I:

1. Take one from the poor shivering individual waving it under my nose, on the ground that they’ll thereby be able to get somewhere warm faster. (Since I suspect they are paid a piece rate.)

2. Refuse it on the ground that this is killing trees, wasting ink, the energy used to transport it here, etc?

* Slang for modification. (I had to look it up.)

The Second Asian History Carnival is up on Muninn, and a lovely wide-ranging selection it is. I found a post on a book setting out the Chinese Communist Party’s view on domestic exploitation particularly interesting.

(And the History Carnival will be up on Thursday – get your nominations in … )

And I should also mention that the Britblog roundup again went travelling this week, this time to a hot place in Edinburgh (shhhurely a contradiction in terms) – and nice to see a couple of women there who were not nominated by me. Don’t forget to nominate yourself this week, if you deserve it!

It is said that those who don’t read history are doomed to repeat it. Salon is looking at a magazine for opt-out mothers, who formerly had high-flying careers – this year’s “great, definitive trend” for women according to well, just about every major news outlet – and finding its articles seem designed for women “desperate for a ray of positivity in what sounds like their hellish daily lives”.

One chart called “Coulda, Shoulda, Woulda” compares, “just for fun,” what CHOs are obligated to do during the holidays vs. what they would actually like to do. Among the required tasks? “Do all the shopping for my entire family and my husband’s relatives,” “Buy a new dress for my husband’s company party,” “Cook endless batches of cookies” and “Put the decorations away and clean the house on New Year’s Day.” Among the things that CHOs would like to do are “Sit in front of a cozy fire drinking wine,” “Buy a whole new winter wardrobe” and “Send my husband to the bakery.”
Another table listing “20 ways to amuse yourself on a bad day” includes suggestions like making “pancakes in the shape of those really nice Jimmy Choos you used to wear before you had kids,” and affixing “a smiley face sticker to your forehead, because frankly, it’s the only smile that’s been on your face all day.” (You have to sit through the Salon advert for that link.)

The article includes an interview with the editor who keeps answering desperately that this is all meant to be a joke, that it is merely tongue-in-cheek.

It sent me looking for a passage from Marilyn French’s The Women’s Room, a book that should be compulsory reading for every high school student (or at the very least the girls):

“Husbands were rarely discussed, but they were always in the background. They were usually brought up to illustrate some absurdity or some construction:
‘Paul likes his coffee strong, so I make it strong and water mine.’
‘Norm refuses to eat pork.’
‘Hamp will not touch a baby’s diaper. Never has. So when they were little, I couldn’t leave them with him at all. That’s why I toilet-trained them so early.’
No one ever questioned such statements, asked why Natalie or Mira didn’t simply insist, or Adele make the coffee the way she liked it and let Paul make his own. Never. Husbands were walls, absolutes, in small things at least. The women would howl and cackle at their incredible demands and impossible delusions, their inexplicable eating habits and their strange predjuduces, but it was as if they were de black folks down to de shanty recounting the absurb pretensions of de white massas up to de big house.”

An essay question: compare and contrast this passage with the words of Erika Kotite, editor of this new ornament to the newstands, called Total 180! –

One of the feature stories for the next issue is called “My Husband Is a Single Man Who Happens to Have a Family.” I mean, I’m sure you found from reading the magazine that we’re trying to be humorous. I don’t know how to put it, but men, as we know, maybe even biologically are able to focus on one thing at a time. Women juggle. The fact that I stay home and watch my kids gives my husband the freedom to not wear that pager because he knows I’ve got it covered. When we’re both home we share. But we had to have that discussion many times, about having shared duty. It’s the same thing women talk about all the time, that their husband doesn’t clean the house or doesn’t do this or that. A man will step over the bag of garbage to get to the beer in the fridge, and a woman will pick up the bag of garbage as soon as she walks into the kitchen.

(I also just love the infantilising, pink-dominated design of the magazine website. Nothing like publishing for grown-ups as though they were 10-year-olds.)

Soho now is the haunt of tourists and theatre day-trippers, swanning advertising executives and swooping shoppers. But it was not always thus. For centuries this area was home to some of the poorest and most desperate people to be found in London and it was a measure of increasing civilisation that in 1931 what are now known as the Marshall Street Baths were opened to “improve the health and wellbeing of the local people”. There were two swimming pools, slipper baths for those without facilities at home, a public laundry and a child welfare centre.

It is no praise to our age that this wonderful facility, built to the highest of artistic and structural standards, has stood derelict since 1997, its fate undecided. But that has provided an opportunity for its use for a unique performance, Deep End, by Corridor, a group that specialises in site-specific events.

The visit begins with a “health and safety” briefing from an officious clipboarded man in a reflective vest, who tells you, in a patronising tone, how developers plan to again make this structure great – mostly with (no doubt astonishingly expensive) apartments, and with one small part restored for public use.

Then you plunge into the building’s past, for an experience that covers all of its history, and seduces all of your senses. At the top of the gorgeously sculpted, gold-railed staircase, you listen as far below, water drips slowing into a galvanised bath that sits in the foundations of the workhouse that occupied this site in 1854 when John Snow in nearby Broadwick Street identified the well that caused a disastrous cholera outbreak. READ MORE