Monthly Archives: May 2006

Carnival of Feminists

The Carnival of Feminists is up …

.. at Women’s Autonomy and Sexual Sovereignty, where Morgaine has done a superb job. She concludes from the contributions:

Such is the lot of women – we get the extremes that society has to offer. The most danger, oppression, poverty. The least expression, respect, even tolerance.

Do go and check it out, and please help to spread the word.

(And a special thanks to Morgaine for forging ahead while I was distracted by other matters, and apologies for informing you of the carnival relatively late. I delivered 1,600 Green Party leaflets today, and my Achilles’ tendons may never forgive me.)

Politics

Worrying about the world’s only super-power

Two stories today about the state of the United States that really do make you worry. Of course the US is a big place, and there are all those stats that only a small percentage of Americans have a passport (20 per cent according to this site, although I suspect that’s an over-estimate), but you’d think people would be at least a bit curious about the rest of the world, since it has after all been having a big impact on American life lately, in one way and another.
Yet 60 per cent of college-age Americans cannot find Iraq on a map:

The survey, carried out in December 2005, also found fewer than three in 10 think it is important to know the locations of countries in the news; only 14 per cent believe another language is a necessary skill; 47 per cent could not find India on a map and 75 per cent could not locate Israel.

And by the time they are middle-aged they might not be healthy enough to care: healthcare costs almost twice as much in the US as in the UK, yet British health by the time citizens reach middle age is, on lots of measures, twice as good:

“Rates of diseases such as diabetes, lung cancer and high blood pressure among Americans aged between 55 and 64 were up to twice as high as in England. Americans also had higher rates of heart disease, heart attacks and strokes.The study’s authors said lifestyle differences such as smoking, drinking and obesity could not explain the difference. “

The tentative conclusion that the researchers come to is that levels of income inequality are to blame.

Neither study suggests a “healthy” (in the broad sense) society.

Feminism Science

Men’s biological clock

When a couple cannot have children, there has always been an assumption that the problem is with the woman. I can still clearly remember the look of pain on my grandmother’s face as she described the “horrible” tests she endured (this must have been in theThirties) – and for a “proper” woman of that era the embarrassment and humiliation must have been great.

Yet at some level, of course, there was always some knowledge, no matter how basic, that at least sometimes the man was the problem. (If he’d been through enough wives/mistresses without begetting a child this was even tacitly acknowledged.)

Even today, however, that is seldom acknowledged, so a French study about men’s declining fertility is particularly interesting:

A father aged over 40 “is a key risk factor for reproduction”. For women under 30, a male partner aged 40 or over reduced their chances of conceiving by a quarter; for women between 35 and 37, a partner over 40 reduced conception to a one-in-three possibility.

…over the past five years similar investigations in Britain and the United States have anticipated the French findings, and have also found late fatherhood to be riskier than traditionally assumed. One study found would-be fathers over 40 half as likely to make their partners pregnant as men under 25; another found fathers over 50 quadrupling the likelihood of having a child with Down’s Syndrome.

History

A classy history carnival…

… is now up at Clioweb. I was particularly taken by Dr Virago’s post on Quod She about Margery Kempe (and not just because it gives me a new way of thinking about some of my English Civil War female “prophetesses”).

Elsewhere in the carnival – and do go to check it out – the BBC’s history unit is under fire over headless Romans, and there is a new timeline of dietary advice. I didn’t know that the key date is 1864:

“First known diet book published: “Letter on Corpulence,” calling for low carbs and daily booze, by William Banting, an English casketmaker who became alarmed when he could no longer tie his shoes. 58,000 copies sold.”

Environmental politics

A non-standard day of canvassing

Two days before the election, today I canvassed some of the more “difficult” areas of my ward. It had interesting results. I had one man who greeted me with a tirade about how we f-ing politicians were all the f-ing same. (I said “sorry to disturb you” and walked off.)

Then I had an encounter that started as a fairly standard: “what do you want” shouted through the door. I explained “Green Party”, “election” etc, and got the response: “We vote Labour here.”

Fine, free country etc.

I’d knocked on a couple of doors down the balcony, and was in a dead-end, when I heard someone hiss “go”. I turned around and saw, a rottweiler from the “Labour” household, approaching rather quickly, hackles raised, having obviously been sooled on me. (They’d shut the door after letting the dog out.)

It was between me and the stairs. Luckily, it was a soft rottweiler really – I took a couple of fast steps toward it, rather than the away it probably expected, then as it went without great conviction for my leg wacked it, not very hard (the whole thing was not the dog’s fault, and I didn’t want to make it too angry), across the face with my floppy cardboard folder.

It decided it wasn’t really that interested. Luckily.

I left. Not at a run. Quite.
Lest this should discourage anyone from getting involved in politics let me say this is highly unusual – in fact I was talking to some experienced people later in the evening and they’d never heard anything like it.

I’m very tempted to go back tomorrow and stick a leaflet through their door, just to show I wasn’t cowed. Would be satisfying, although bad politics, since it would make them more likely to turn out to vote, I’d judge.

Feminism

How ‘experts’ under-rate the public

The ‘experts’ are convinced that women are just “forgetting” to have children, relying too much on the not-so-miracle cure of reproductive technology to have babies relatively late in life. A poll today in the Guardian shows that isn’t the case:

The poll makes it clear that people are not relying on fertility technology to allow them to have children later. Only 35% of men and women said they would think of delaying having children because of it.

The results show that while most people think it is best to have a baby before 30 (they are answering a question about the “ideal”), they simply are not making this their top priority – above, say, personal happiness, by perhaps grabbing the first vaguely appropriate partner who comes along.

On that line, Libby Brookes drags out that old story about “too much choice” stopping people forming partnerships. Stuff and nonsense – turn the lens around the other way, and realise that in the past there was very little choice, and people got stuck in all sorts of horrible relationships, sometimes even going into them knowing they would be pretty awful, but feeling they had no other option. Celebrate choice!