Monthly Archives: May 2006

History Women's history

Peterborough Cathedral: Prominent women, tragic women

peterboroughcathedral
Off on Thursday to Peteborough, for reasons to be described elsewhere. But had enough time to check out the truly spectacular cathedral, the majority of which was built between 1118 and 1238, although there’s been a church here since 655AD.It had a rough first half-millennium – destroyed by the Danes in 870, burned down by accident in 1116 . Then it had a disasterous fire in 2001, which means the inside has a very “newly restored” feel.

But you can’t beat the view above, across the lovely grassed square at the front of the cathedral.Its second glory is the painted ceiling pictured below, dating back to about 1230. This must have been a truly important place then – perhaps a growing wool economy? – althought the important was helped by an enthusiastic abbott, Aelfsey (abbott from 1005-1055 – he must have started young).

A chronicler described him as “a laborious bee”, and gullible is another word that might have been applied. He collected “part of Aaron’s rod, piece of Our Lord’s swaddling cloth, a shoulder blade of one of the Holy Innocents [the babies killed by Herod] and a piece of bread from the feeding of the 5,000″. Although it was his successor who got “St Oswald’s arm“, which was to be the monastery’s most important relic until the Dissolution.

A really battered memorial, perhaps fairly really, of John Chambers, the last abbott, who became the first bishop of the diocese of Peterborough (so quite happy to change sides) marks that.

read more »

Friday Femmes Fatales

Friday Femmes Fatales No 58

Ten great posts from 10 new (to me) women bloggers. It is here every Friday (more or less ..)

Starting off this week with THE big internet issue, Laura Scott on Rare Patterns sets out the case for net neutrality.

Staying political, Litbrit on The Last Duchess concludes If It Walks Like a Racist – or Drives a Border Patrol Buggy Like One, it is probably George Bush.

Turning on the science, The Disgruntled Chemist on Nice Shoes, Wanna Fock (perfectly safe for work, unless the title is likely to cause upset), answers in the negative a question I’d previously pondered: Do room air-purifiers have any effect at all?

But not all science is so well founded, as Nyarly on Dispatches from Tanganyika found when she looked at the details of that American-British health study. One problem – all of the research subjects were male.

Heading towards the personal side, Denise on Dot Moms (a group blog with some 40 members) has some advice for women expecting twins: “Sit down. Just sit. Call me and remind me what its like.” Staying with babies, somewaterytart on Tart Juice addresses “some seriously ill-informed comments about baby safety”.

Katie on Everyone Else Has A Blog writes for Blogging Against Disabilism Day: It “isn’t just about random fucked up blokes shouting ‘Cripple!’ in tube stations.”

If you’re feeling the need for some healthy reading, Molly on Orangette was going to bring cupcakes, but settled for some healthy, and yummy looking lima beans instead. On the same topic, but in a different language, C’est Moi Qui l’ai Fait is exploring wildflowers and pesto. (Plenty of pics if you’re not feeling up to reading the French.)

Finally, going multimedia, on The Pink of Perfection, my first femme fatale video-blog (vlog if you fancy jargon) – a picture tells a thousand words in the transformation of a humble chair.

***

If you missed last week’s edition, it is here. (If you’d like to see all of them as a list, click on the category “Friday Femmes Fatales” in the righthand sidebar. That will take you to a collection of 580 (and counting) women bloggers.)

***

Please: In the next week if you read, or write, a post by a woman blogger and think “that deserves a wider audience” (particularly someone who doesn’t yet get many hits), drop a comment. It really does make my life easier. (Thanks to Penny this week!)

Early modern history Women's history

The last will and testament of Dame Helen Branch (1593)

It has taken me far too long, and I really can’t complain about the writing, but I have now finally completed the transcription of the will of my amazing dame, who died the year following the making of this will, at the age of 90.

I’ve put the full transcript below the fold, since in detail it isn’t exactly gripping reading. Any of my early modernist readers who feel like taking a shot at the italicised words (which I can’t identify fully) would be most welcome to do so; also I’d greatly welcome any general thoughts on the contents.

I think Dame Helen broadly fits into the “godly” mould – in fact an expert was telling me her second husband certainly did, but the will seems to me quite light on that sort of rhetoric. (Although of course that might in part be the influence of the scribe.)

Generally the form is pretty standard, but there are a couple of places where I think the words and character of Dame Branch come through – in the preamble when she humbly gives god thanks for being in “perfecte memory” (at the age of 89!) and in the careful listing of all of the jails and hospitals to which money was to go. Also perhaps the way it rambles a little – an old lady just thinking her thoughts out loud, rather than starting at the biggest bequest and working her way down the list.

Her executor is her brother’s son Robert Nicholson (which I already knew), although I didn’t know the brother Beniamyne (possibly Robert’s father – got to chase that) was still alive. He presumably must be also a pretty significant age – some good genes in there, although the fact that Robert got all the work suggests he’s fully “retired”. (All the father gets is a black gown, presumably to attend the funeral.)

One thing that strikes me about the will is how broad Dame Helen’s social circle still is, even at her great age. There are godchildren being left gold rings, lots of neighbours and widows (presumably friends) – although unfortunately many of them have common names, which is going to make them hard to track down.

Interesting too that she wants to be buried as near as possible to her first husband (Mynors), not her second – and that neither husband’s family has an obvious role in her life (although no way of knowing at the moment if there are female relatives from them along the line – at present I know nothing at the Wismans/Wisemans, or the Hide/Hydes or which side cosen Thomas Smyth comes from. Why did he have to have such a common name?!)

read more »

Women's history

Trip to Reading on the cards

From next Tuesday at the Museum of English Rural Life in Reading, Berkshire: Action Women: The Real Story Behind the Women’s Institutes.

“A main thrust is to show the range of activities that the WI and its members have undertaken over the years,” says Fiona Moorhead, of the Women’s Library, which is curating the exhibition. “It will be arranged along themes ranging from how, in the early years, the WI helped rural women who were isolated, to recent campaigns such as chemicals in food. The exhibition is about getting across how dynamic these women are.”

Science

Serious and lighthearted science

A report today identifies two colonies of chimpanzees in a corner of Cameroon as the source of the HIV pandemic, suggesting that are the reservoir of the apparently harmless SIV virus that mutated when a hunter came in contact with chimpanzee blood. What’s particularly interesting is the timeframe:

Researchers believe the virus infected humans some time before the 1930s and was gradually spread by river travel. All of the rivers in Cameroon run into the Sangha, which joins the Congo river running past Kinshasa.

Trade along the routes could have spread the virus, which slowly built up in the human population….

The first clearly identified case of Aids reported in the United States was in 1981, though it seems an African American teenager died of it in St Louis in 1969.

Which does make you wonder how many other such viruses are building up out there. We sometimes think in the West that “modern medicine” understands everything, but as a the victim of a very nasty bug caught in India – variously diagnosed as chickenpox, typhus and “mystery tropical illness”, this last I’m sure the most accurate – I’ve was disabused of that myth.

Turning to more cheerful matters: the great riddle is answered – the egg came first.

Professor John Brookfield, a specialist in evolutionary genetics at the University of Nottingham, who was put to work on the dilemma, said that the pecking order was perfectly clear: the living organism inside the eggshell would have the same DNA as the chicken that it would become.

“Therefore, the first living thing which we could say unequivocally was a member of the species would be this first egg,” he said. “So I would conclude that the egg came first.”

Seems conclusive to me; an “almost-chicken” produced a chicken.

Somehow, though, I don’t think that will stop the debate, particularly in the pub around about closing time…

Miscellaneous

The joys of the English language

From this week’s Camden New Journal: “A-list versus B-list in battle of the celebrity-haunt pub”.

The pub might indeed be the haunt of celebrities, but it is not a phrase that turns around very well. Chris Evans in a white sheet anyone? (Not a bad idea, come to think of it.)

Playing with the Oxford reference collection, it came up with this quotation from Tennyson, however, which does seem appropriate:

I come from haunts of coot and hern,
I make a sudden sally
And sparkle out among the fern,
To bicker down a valley.

(From “The Brook” 1855)