Monthly Archives: July 2006

Early modern history Women's history

Not Poulter’s measure, but a “fourteener”?

I’m trying to teach myself to analyse the formats of Renaissance poetry, as you do. I’ve got a piece that I thought might be poulter’s measure (a 14-syllable line followed by a 12-syllable one), but it seems instead by my count to be straight fourteener. Do you agree? All thoughts and suggestions welcome …!

This world is full of snares and trappes, temptations unto sinne,
As well in generations past, as this that we live in.
Compare our selves unto a tree, which springeth up with sap,
And brings forth branches goodly ones, which taste of Adams hap.
And as this tree doth grow to strength, the owner of the wood,
May lop away the branches faire as them which are not good.
So hath he lopt away from us a Ladie Branch of price,
That Lived here right worshipfull, disdaining every vice:
Whose lacke her friends do much bewaile, but especially the poore,
Whom she continually did feede, aboard and at her doore.

(This piece doesn’t have stanzas, so I’ve just taken what seems a logical chunk out of it.)

And no, I’m not claiming this as a lost literary masterpiece…

Feminism

Are men necessary…

… and no this isn’t the start of a women and bicycles joke. But, once you slog past the super-models in bikinis, included on distinctly thin grounds, and the women inexplicably dressed in evening wear and with makeup slathered on like concrete (so Daily Mail!) there is actually a proper, interesting story in today’s Observer Woman magazine.

All that stuff about how all boys being reared by their mothers turn into hoodie-wearning hooligans … seems it is wrong. Instead, a researcher has found that many families are better off without the dad.

Peggy Drexler, an assistant professor of psychology at Cornell University and a former gender scholar at Stanford University, has published Raising Boys Without Men: How Maverick Moms are Creating the Next Generation of Exceptional Men (Rodale Books). In a unique study she followed more than 60 fatherless families over 10 years. As time went by she practically became another member of the family in these households. She picked up boys from school, dropped them off at sports clubs, spent weekends and holidays talking in depth to both them and their mothers. All the while taking notes and taping conversations. What she discovered stunned her and has divided public opinion. It goes to the heart of the very idea of the apple-pie American family: is it necessary for a son to have a dad?

Since the book was published she has criss-crossed the country, talking about her research in the nation’s bookshops, lecture theatres, radio stations and television studios. She’s been short-listed for publishing awards and approached by HBO to make a documentary based on the families she met. Her findings contradict many judges, social scientists, religious groups and pundits. But what she discovered was that a boy’s morality and masculinity can be cultivated without a live-in father.

Indeed, she goes even further. In her view, traditional families have much to learn from these households: that boys from fatherless homes can fare better than boys raised in nuclear families.

Theatre

Two plays

Now up over on My London Your London is a review of Late Fragment, now playing at the Tristan Bates Theatre in Soho. It is a slick, emotionally wrenching production, if a little short on point.

Coming up soon will be a review of Spring Awakening, a fascinating, sophisticated production at the Union Theatre in Southwark. If you’ve got to choose, pick this one. It was written in 1891 by Frank Wedekind, 26, but not produced unexpurgated in the UK until 1874, and it is clear why – its critical view of Christianity, of parents’ treatment of children, and adolescent sexuality is seriously radical.

Feminism

Of course it is the women’s fault…

It was the WAGS (wives and girlfriends) wot lost England the World Cup – oddly enough, didn’t see one of them on the field.

McLaren, who succeeds Sven-Goran Eriksson as England manager, feels that the WAGs’ conspicuous high spending in designer stores and raucous partying in the bars of Baden-Baden, England’s World Cup base, did not help the teams’ performance in the World Cup. England went out on penalties to Portugal in the quarter-final.

And it is not mother who knows best, but a “top fertility doctor” (unsurprisingly male), who says that women over a certain (unspecified) age should not be given fertility treatment: “Abdalla believes the practice should be halted because elderly mothers may not live long enough to see their children grow up.”

So presumably he also believes in compulsory vasectomies for males over the same age (in fact a few years younger, no doubt, since men on average die younger than women)?

Early modern history Women's history

When a poet really, really gets it wrong…

I’ve been reading a very handy 1956 thesis – happily available on microfilm – Conventions and Characteristics of the English Funeral Elegy of the Earlier Seventeenth Century, (University of Missouri). And I just had to share what the author, H.H. Hale, describes as the “most graceless” example, Francis Beaumont’s “Elegy on the Lady Markham” a relative of the influential Lucy, Countess of Bedford.

The poet tells his readers that although he never saw Lady Markham in life he fell in love with her corpse, and likes the fact he can now…

Her grassgreene mantle, and her sheet display,
And touc her naked, and though th’ envious mould
In which she lies uncovered, moist and cold,
Strive to corrupt her, she will not abide
With any art her blemishes to hide…”

He directs the worms to gently eat her flesh, to eat into her ear-lobes to form holes for earrings, and finally to eat her epitaph upon her forehead: “Living, she was young, faire, and full of wit / Dead, all her faults are in her forehead writ.”
p. 38-39

Seriously sick!

Early modern history Women's history

For the Bible scholars among you …

… or just those who didn’t get hopelessly bored at Sunday school, I’m working on a late 16th-century elegy for a twice-widowed rich London woman, with the following passage, which refers, I assume, to women from the Bible:

So that hir three-fold godly life alludeth
To virgin Ruth, wife Sara, widdow Judith

I’m struggling to make sense of this.

The Bible Ruth that seems to get all the Google hits is a widow, so that is a bit puzzling.

Sara, if the wife of Abraham hardly seems to present an ideal life.

The lead widow Judith is the one who cut off Holofernes’ head, but although she’s a favourite figure for painting she hardly seems like an ideal model.

As ever, TIA!