Monthly Archives: January 2007

Carnival of Feminists

Drumroll please … Carnival of Feminists No 30

There’s been a little break over Christmas, since I’ve decided to stick to the official “first and third Wednesday” timing, so you should be feeling hungry for the new Carnival of Feminists. Hunger no longer – No 30 is now up on The Feminist Pulse, and it is an superb carnival, entirely worth the wait.

Among the highlights is a post from Elizabeth on A Blog Without A Bicycle, who hosted Carnival No 26, features for setting out her entire research project, appropriately enough titled: “Carnival Collectivities: Blogging and the Formation of Online Feminist Networks”. Is that postmodern or what? (In a good way of course.)

There’s some of the huge Christmas rows of the feminist blogosphere, should you need to catch up, but also a great many subjects to start your mind off in new directions.

Don’t waste time here – go over and check it out!

Feminism

Getting what you wish for …

An astonishingly bitchy piece today in the Telegraph – up even to Daily Mail standards of misogyny – about how men are said to be giving up on “trophy wives” because they keep “going bad”… becoming, (add horror movie music here) toxic wives.

“It is like a perversion of the evolution theory: they have evolved into creatures whose function is simply to get the most for doing the least,” whispered an exhausted husband to me recently. “I wouldn’t mind providing her with so much if she just did something for me occasionally. She’s never even once cooked me a meal.”

Well if you want a woman who is 40 but looks like she’s 21, with the breasts, thighs, and face to match, she’s going to have to spend pretty well every minute of the day attending to that – and she mightn’t have time to keep up with French philosophy or gourmet cooking.

If you seek a capable woman and turn her into your dependent, she’ll probably turn out at being good at getting things out of you, just as she was once good at her job.

It is called getting what you wish for…

And although it is not entirely clear from the website, I suspect that this is in the “news” section: MSM journalism really is going down the tubes…

Environmental politics

How to destroy something fine to produce something bad

One of the last great rainforests of Southeast Asian, in the Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park in Sumatra, is being felled, to grow coffee. Bad, low-value coffee.

The low-grade robusta beans grown in the area are used to make instant and packet coffee and energy drinks by some of the biggest names in the business, including Kraft Foods, Nestlé and ED&F Man.

So the last refuge for the greatly endangered hairy rhino, and the Sumatra tiger, and the home of wild elephants, goes for a few cans of Red Bull….

Feminism Science

How can a uterus transplant be justified?

There’s been angst in Britain recently about the problem of regulating IVF – how do you balance patients’ frequent desperation to have a child, the health risks they may be running for themselves and, even more morally problematic, for the possible child-to-be, and the frequently exceedingly high costs to society.

Now it is going further – doctors in the US are contemplating a womb transplant.

Now kidney transplants, liver transplants, even, perhaps, heart transplants; they are all morally unproblematic so far as I’m concerned. Without them, the patients are highly likely to die. They choose for understandable reasons to take the significant medical risks (the operation, the continuing immune-suppression drugs etc) in the hope of many years of relatively healthy life.

But what of a woman who is entirely healthy but happens not to have a functional uterus for one reason or another? Should she be allowed to subject herself to two major operations (the implanting of the donor organ, and its later planned removal), the potential, largely unknown risks to any foetus being developed in that womb, and the huge cost – all so she can bear a child herself, when she has many other opportunities – adoption, even surrogacy?

I think not. And perhaps that final argument is the strongest. How many lives of women could that cash save?

On Radio Four’s PM tonight, there was an item about the first anniversary of the inauguration of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf in Liberia, Africa’s first female head of state. It focused on her campaign against rape, and its notable lack of success.

At the account’s centre was the story of an 11-year-old who died many months after a rape in which she had probably suffered an abdominal fistula due to its violence. (An outcome of rape on which I had written elsewhere.)

How much cash would have paid for treatment to save her life: £100 would probably have done it. You’d get a lot of such treatments for the cost of one uterus transplant…

(A report on the problem of rape in Liberia. (Some may find this account traumatic.)

Books

How could I resist?

What Kind of Reader Are You?

Your Result: Obsessive-Compulsive Bookworm

You’re probably in the final stages of a Ph.D. or otherwise finding a way to make your living out of reading. You are one of the literati. Other people’s grammatical mistakes make you insane.

Dedicated Reader
Book Snob
Literate Good Citizen
Non-Reader
Fad Reader
What Kind of Reader Are You?
Create Your Own Quiz

(You can blame Purple Elephant’s Corner.)

History

5,000 years of the nuclear bomb…

… that was one of the posts I particularly enjoyed from the latest History Carnival, now up on Investigations of a Dog. Just imagine the campfire scene…

I also found through it a great new (to me) biography-blog, Civil War Women.

And the always excellent Laura James explains the history of that oft-used parental phrase reading the riot act.