Monthly Archives: November 2010

Feminism

Scottish Women’s Aid – impressive, but threatened…

I spent (a very packed and interesting) weekend at the Scottish Green Party conference. More on this shortly, but one of the highlights was learning more about women’s issues in Scotland.

Scottish Women’s Aid had a stall at the conference, and a very hardhitting campaign with its “Save Violence Against Women” pledge. Up until now, they’ve had funding and support that we can only envy in England.

The Rape Crisis Specific Fund has provided £50,000 per rape crisis centre per year across Scotland to ensure a basic level of service, also funding the creation of five new rape crisis centres. The Children’s Services Fund has provided more than 100 children’s workers.

But they are clearly concerned that cutbacks mean this is all at risk.

Steady funding has, however, enable them to build real political muscle and lobbying capacity – again something that in England we can only envy.

They had an excellent paper from the Scottish Women’s Budget Group, which campaigns for Gender Budget Analysis in public spending decisions and budget-setting processes “as a means of ensuring both compliance with the requirements for gender impact assessment (Equality Act 2006), and as a means of ensuring political commitment to gender equality are translated into decisions about resource allocation and budgetary commitments.”

A Women’s Aid report identifies just over £8.3m a year spent by the Scottish government on violence against women, the current allocation of which will run out in March 2011. (A study in the UK in 2008 estimated domestic abuse costs in England and Wales £40bn per annum.) A study, also there, found that the cost savings in providing housing and support to women fleeing domestic violence was almost £19,000 per individual women, twice the cost of providing support.” Additionally: “When women threatened by domestic violence were able to access support services and leave an abusive partner, the risk of further assults was reduced by 80%.”

They also had an interesting summary report from a census conducted over 24 hours on September 24, 2009. In that time 365 women and 360 children were in Scottish refuges, 642 women and 307 children and young people were being supported by Women’s Aid, 101 women contacted Women’s Aid for the first time, and 12 women and 5 children had to be turned away from refuges due to lack of space. Sadly, four women had to be turned away because they had “no recourse to public funds” as a result of their immigvration status. “Most are forced to return to their partner.”

Politics

Mayor and London Assembly Question Time in Camden

To Mayor and London Assembly Question Time in Camden this evening, which proved rather livelier, and less bogged down in political pointscoring than I expected, with the notable exception of Caroline (did-I-mention-the Lib-Dems) Pidgeon. It was also surprising (or not) that somehow while everyone else’s microphone went on and off, Boris Johnson’s was perpetually on, allowing him to butt in whenever he wanted.

On the proposed UKCMRI medical lab in Somers Town, was pleased to hear Brian Coleman publicly repeat his opposition, but very disappointed by Jennette Arnold’s backing for it (definitely a letter heading her way) – seems like she’s swallowed the Gordon Brown line.

The mayor, probably reasonably enough, was not commenting on development applications on which he might have to rule, a point made before the UKCMRI question.

Other notable points/questions:

* Jenny Jones: “anyone who thinks we are going to have the same number of police numbers [after the cuts] is barking mad.” She also noted that the Tory-LibDem coalition was planning to abolish the Police Authority, with “something puny being put in its place”. To save money Jenny suggested that the Territorial Support Group would be cut by half and the number of press officers (“a scandal” at 72) be reduced.

* Boris Johnson had a tough time (rightly) on the closure of Tube ticket officers and the reduction in safety staff – he apparently signed a pledge not to cut ticket office hours before the election. On this, as on many other questions, he simply warbled on a bit without substantive answer.

* Shahrar Ali got possibly the strongest round of applause of the night for a question on the closure of Tube lines for works, particularly at weekends, asking for at a minimum transparency about what is being done and why. “God help you if you happen to live and work in Brent and need to get out.”

* A question on when London cycle hire bikes would get to Kentish Town was also popular – Boris appeared to be mixing Kentish Town and Highgate when he suggested North London was too hilly for the scheme. (In fact he suggested expansion east and west would come before the north, if the last happened at all.)