{"id":42,"date":"2004-09-09T01:13:39","date_gmt":"2004-09-09T01:13:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/philobiblon.co.uk\/?p=42"},"modified":"2004-09-09T01:13:39","modified_gmt":"2004-09-09T01:13:39","slug":"wave-x-of-feminism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/philobiblon.co.uk\/?p=42","title":{"rendered":"Wave X of feminism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In England and American we&#8217;ve had, according to common labels, second and perhaps third wave feminism: thoroughly ethnocentric labels.<\/p>\n<p>The first-wave of feminism, although we&#8217;ll never be able to recover it unless time machines are invented, was probably paleolithic, but reading any period of history the continual presence of such &#8220;waves&#8221; soon become obvious.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m reading Natalie Zemon Davis&#8217;s <em>Society and Culture in Early Modern France<\/em>, which contains her famous essay on &#8220;Women on Top&#8221;. (It must be the single most-cited article that I&#8217;ve come across so I thought I had to buy the book: abebooks came through again, it&#8217;s amazing how often American bookshops are cheaper, even with the postage. The price of the book was about \u00c2\u00a31!)<\/p>\n<p>Writing about <em>charivaris<\/em>, &#8220;a noisy, masked demonstration to humiliate some wrongdoer in the community&#8221;, Davis says: that while in the countryside protests against second marriages were dominant, in the cities most common were those against domineering wives. She says: &#8220;there were important and little-understood changes going on in the relations between men and women in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, reflected in the <em>charivaris<\/em> against henpecked husbands, in the worsening position of women in French law, and in the independent interest of some city women in Protestantism.&#8221; (Stanford Uni Press, 1979, p. 117.) <\/p>\n<p>So much historical writing still seems to read the conduct books and other injunctions to women and assume they were meek and complicit in their own oppression; I very much doubt that has ever been the case!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In England and American we&#8217;ve had, according to common labels, second and perhaps third wave feminism: thoroughly ethnocentric labels. The first-wave of feminism, although we&#8217;ll never be able to recover it unless time machines are invented, was probably paleolithic, but reading any period of history the continual presence of such &#8220;waves&#8221; soon become obvious. I&#8217;m [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-miscellaneous","author-natalie-bennett"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/philobiblon.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/philobiblon.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/philobiblon.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/philobiblon.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/philobiblon.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=42"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/philobiblon.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/philobiblon.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=42"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/philobiblon.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=42"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/philobiblon.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=42"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}