Category Archives: Environmental politics

Environmental politics Politics

The anti-4×4 campaign has a success

THANDIE NEWTON, the British star of Crash, the Hollywood hit film, has become a crusader against gas-guzzling cars after a Greenpeace activist slapped stickers on her 4×4 accusing her of adding to global warming.
This week, Newton, 33, will make her support for the anti-emissions campaign public by writing to fellow Hollywood stars and other celebrities who drive such vehicles, asking them to join her in switching to greener forms of transport.

One solution to this problem is to make these dinosaurs in cities profoundly unfashionable; to make their ownership symbolic of ignorance and irresponsibility. (Which of course it is.)
***
OK, that’s the bit of good news I’ve found for the day. In Zimbabwe, the situation is going from bad to worse – as shown by the rate of discarded babies being found around the city. (Warning, quite graphic story, complete with an astonishing quote from a quasi-official figure about how they block the plumbing…)
***
Then, with Tony Blair (soon may he go, although from the Green Party perspective perhaps not until after the local election – he is so good for our campaign) seemingly wedded to nuclear power, a timely story on the anniversary of Chernobyl: the BRITISH farmers who still have to get their stock checked with a Geiger counter before they can take them to market.

Environmental politics

Quote of the day from the doorstep

Intercom: Buzz, Buzz

Mature woman’s voice: Yes?

Me: I’m one of your Green Party candidates for the local election. Have you thought about voting Green?

Voice: (Laughs.) No. I’m a member of the Labour Party, with all its horrors….

****

The other event of the day was the young gentleman who dripped down the hall from the shower, wrapped in a towel, his face covered with shaving cream.

Sorry!

Environmental politics Feminism

Another fundamentally anti-female culture…

A Japanese feminist has beenbanned from speaking at a lecture series by the Tokyo Municipal Government:

“Last July, Professor Ueno was chosen by a citizens’ group in the Greater Tokyo district of Kokubunji as the first speaker in a series of lectures on human rights; the events were to be sponsored by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government. But according to the group, Tokyo officials objected to the choice of Ueno because she might use the phrase “gender-free” – a poorly defined term originally intended to mean free from sexual bias. The citizen’s group refused to find another speaker and instead cancelled the series of events. …
“Gender-free” is an imported English phrase that has been used in Japan since the mid-1990s. Some progressive teachers and local education authorities have used the phrase to promote liberal sex education, and the mixed listing of boys and girls on school roll calls. The latter is contentious in Japan where traditionally boys’ names are read out first.

Nothing like telling kids from an early age who is regarded as important…

***

I eat organic food (as much as I can, while also trying to take account of “food miles”) primarily because I think the form of farming needs to be encouraged. (And organic yoghurt tastes MUCH better than the plastic non-organic stuff.) But like the author of this article whether there is any actual direct harm from the pesticides in food I’m not sure. But he offers an interesting parallel:

He cited the long-burning, but now resolved, debate about the health impact of smoking: “An official at Brown & Williamson, a cigarette maker now owned by RJ Reynolds, once noted in a memo: ‘Doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the “body of fact” that exists in the mind of the general public.’ Toward that end, the tobacco manufacturers dissected every study, highlighted every question, magnified every flaw, cast every possible doubt every possible time … It was all a charade, of course, because the real science was inexorable. But the uncertainty campaign was effective: it delayed public-health protections, and compensation for tobacco’s victims, for decades.”
Pesticide campaigners say that they see some parallels in their own struggle to get pesticides banned or severely restricted.

You might make the same parallel with those proclaiming their doubts about the reality of global warming.

***

Some interesting figures on immigration, legal and illegal:

* There are between 310,000 and 570,000 illegal immigrants in the UK, according to Home Office estimates
* If allowed to live legally, they would pay more than £1bn in tax each year
* Migrants fill 90% of low-paid jobs in London and account for 29% of the capital’s workforce. London is the UK’s fastest-growing region
* Legal migrants comprise 8.7% of the population, but contribute 10.2% of all taxes. Each immigrant pays an average of £7,203 in tax, compared with £6,861 for non-migrant workers
* There were 25,715 people claiming asylum last year. If allowed to work, they would generate £123m for the Treasury

Environmental politics

Wealth and poverty

A very curious afternoon of Green canvassing today, from the Regent’s Park council estate – and some lovely polite pensioners – over 100 metres or so to the extreme wealth of the Georgian mansions lining the park. Not much luck there, it seems the rich are still in Barbados, or in the office working to pay for all of this. If anyone is at home it is usually “the staff”.

Not quite as bad as Manila, where (when I was there anyway) there was a corrugated-iron shanty town in the shadow of the presidential palace, but close.

Seems an appropriate point to direct attention to this article on the measurement of poverty, which argues for adopting a poverty line that measures relative poverty. (And incidentally tells of the career of an obviously very formidable woman, Mollie Orshansky.)

Environmental politics History

Test your reading skills …

I’m drooping over the keyboard, having spent my day dashing around, and around, and around Camden, helping to sort out nomination papers for the total of 54 candidates the Green Party is hoping to stand (so everyone will have the chance to give us their three votes). For those who claim civil society is dead, or that community spirit is, it is lovely to see the response of people when you knock on the door asking for their signature. They are really pleasant and helpful, even when they aren’t Green voters.

But a couple of little gems from the Inbox:

Test your ability to read 17th-century handwriting, and learn how to do it better – a great idea. There are seven documents, rated into three levels of difficulty. You type your reading in, and the site compares it to the “perfect” one. Too tired to even think about trying it, but I will. (Although whether I share the results might depend on how I do…!)

Then, we’ve already learnt to think about food miles, but this article goes further in saying we should look at the “fuel consumption” of everything we eat. Food for thought. Guess I’d better join that 10-year waiting list for an allotment…

Environmental politics

How to put your best ear forward for the Green Party

Found a new twist to the doorstop canvassing game this afternoon, on a road of Georgian terraces split into multiple, some of them very multiple, flats fitted with video intercoms. This is also a very busy road, with lots of buses and trucks, and generally noisy traffic. And rain – of course – I’m the rain god of canvassers – was making it worse.

So one presses the buzzer, assumes a polite but friendly expression, and tries not to look like a would-be Big Brother contestant while delivering a friendly explanation of your presence. But what to do after you’ve finished the initial speel? Your only hope of hearing their response is to stick you ear right up to the speaker, so that the person inside is getting a really attractive view of your ear canal.

Mmmm… still trying to work that one out.

But for a relatively unpromising part of Regent’s Park got some really positive responses to the Green Party message, and got posters into a couple of really brilliant placed windows, so it was worth an afternoon in the rain.