Monthly Archives: April 2005

Miscellaneous

The women who succeeded in early Australia

Early Australian history is usually told as a male-dominated story, and it is remarkable how often this is a story of male failure – Burke and Wills et al. The women who do appear are usually painted in lurid colours as prostitutes and slatterns, or as the odd lonely, isolated “lady”, having a thoroughly miserable time of it.

Yet I’ve just read a collection of (mostly) success stories in which women undertake amazing feats and complete them with aplomb.

Just imagine the journey of Annie Caldwell, an Irishwoman who arrived in Adelaide as a free settler with her husband Matthew in 1841 with almost nothing. They both laboured to earn enough to take a lease on a small farm at Gumeracha, near Adelaide, but the land was poor and the rainfall scant. Matthew died in 1856, leaving Annie pregnant with their eighth child.

She decided to move to NSW in 1864, selling “everything except five horses, some cattle, Lassie the dog and a tilted wagon – similar to covered wagons in America”.

They took eight weeks to cover the 900km trek to Albury and they took up land near Holbrook (one of my old stamping grounds, where to my knowledge there is no memorial to her – although there should be!), where they selected a block in her oldest son’s name.

One of the children said: “How hard we all did work! Mother seemed able to turn her hand to any sort of man’s work after her ten years as sole manageress.” The farm did well and Annie died aged 69, surrounded by her family. (p. 15-17)

This book is A Wealth of Women: Australian Women’s Lives from 1788 to the Present, by Alison Alexander, which takes a fascinating, anecdotal approach to the topic, drawing heavily on the “History Search” by the Office of the Status of Women of 2000, which collected oral histories and much of the work of family historians.

The latter, it seems to me, is a much underutilised resource. No doubt it has its technical limits – but many family stories – particularly women’s stories – are now being recorded that should not be lost again.

The success that many female convicts made of life in Australia is an element that comes out again and again. Little has been written on this until recently, since this was until the 1980s regarded as a “stain” rather than the badge of honour that it is today. There’s for example Mary Smallshaw, a Welsh silk throwster transported for theft in 1818. She married first the clerk of the Tasmanian magistrate’s court, then, after bearing him a daughter, the magistrate himself, and her descendants were “respectable society”. (p. 6)

Although there were ladies made thoroughly miserable by the conditions. I particularly liked the one horrified at having to drink out of handless cups, and by the lack of visiting cards — if you visited someone who was out a piece of chalk was left near the door so you could record your presence on it!

And others were trapped with feckless males. The tale of Matilda Wallace, whose husband moved them from Mt Gambier (South Australia) to Mount Murchison, where he tried in a desultory why to open a shop, to Queensland, then spent the next decade roaming those areas, seldom more than six months in one spot. Two babies died young, and when her fifth was due she went to “civilisation” in Menindee – still the back of beyond.

It is story that reminds me of the mammoth tome I have just finished, The Fortunes of Richard Mahony, by (Henry Handel) Ethel Florence Lindesay Richardson.

Friday Femmes Fatales

Friday femmes fatales No 5

“Where are all the female bloggers?” HERE, in my weekly “top ten.” Why “femmes fatales”? Because these are killer posts, selected for great ideas and great writing, general interest, and variety.

I’m a blogger but not a geek, so I can’t work out how to point you to a specific post by the astonishing Miss W Todd, but if you follow this link and go exploring you won’t regret it. (Particularly look under “Libre” on April 4 for “Ceci n’est pa une pape”.)

The Goddess, meanwhile, sums up the state of the universe in one giant post, from the job of Pope to the unfairness of rich people always winning on Ebay. Meanwhile, Cheryl Rofer on Whirled view sums up the state of her garden with considerably more knowledge than most of us can manage.

Who moved my truth finds that people who believe in a “Higher Power” are curiously unable to believe in their own, while Blondesense is musing that a childhood image of Jesus holding a lamb doesn’t seem to square with the behaviour she sees from religious people today.

Kirsten on “re:invention” explains why when she says “I quit” on a bad day, she doesn’t mean it, while Jory de Jardins considers how she was socialised to do the “berrypicking” work, even when qualified for serious big game hunting.

A term for working mothers that flourished under the Nazis is still extant today, and seems to go a long way towards explaining Germany’s very low birthrate, Emma Pearse writes on Women’s enews, while Sisters Talk asks if the facts of DNA might do something to tackle racism in America.

And finally, Surfette, among others, announces the BlogHer conference in July.

If you missed last week’s edition, it is here.

***********

Please: In the next week if you read, or write, a post by a woman blogger and think “that deserves a wider audience” (particularly someone who doesn’t yet get many hits), send me an email (natalieben at gmail dot com) or drop a comment here.

Disclaimer: the views here might not reflect my own. I’m trying to choose from as wide a range of female bloggers as possible.

Miscellaneous

Frozen TV

Back in Australia after 10 years away, I’m struck by how there seem to be no new male television news personalities. One of the first things I saw was George Negus presenting SBS’s Dateline, then there’s Andrew Denton doing celebrity interviews. There are so many tributes (or not) to the arts of the plastic surgeon and the wigmaker.

Of course all the women have changed – anyone visibly over 40 and on TV being strictly forbidden.

Miscellaneous

Australia’s religious right

I posted last week on my current reading on Australian politics, Marion Maddox’s God Under Howard.

Overall I thought it a powerful, and scary, analysis, if suffering from some of the inevitable faults of an academic book completed very soon after the events that it describes.

She brings from other fields some interesting analytical tools, including the sociology of religion thesis that as a society becomes more secular, non-religious people are happy to think that religion is a useful implement for controlling others weaker than themselves (p.188).

Sometimes she seems to be arguing that “a religious fundamentalist tail is wagging a secular rightwing dog” (p. 73), and other times that a conservative social policy is an essential requirement for free market economics (when her analysis approaches that of Thomas Frank’s of America), and I don’t think that is ever resolved, but then there is probably an element of leadership on both sides.

She is also very clear on the right-wing view of “equality”, “as reinvented by the neo-conservative think tanks of the closing decades of the 20th century … wants everyone treated identically, regardless of where they start. Any extra help to some groups, however disadvantaged, amounts to ‘special privileges’, which breeds ‘resentment’ among those who do not qualify.” (p. 111)

She is echoing American commentators on the way that the American Right (with Australia’s close behind) uses extreme language to address its extremist constituency, then half-hearted apologies and back-downs later (as per Bush’s “crusade” against Islam) to satisfy the mainstream.

Her final chapter — understandably sketchy since these extremists are unlikely to fully reveal their apparent approach — is truly frightening. She quotes an Australian Republican Movement delegate to the constitutional convention, Karin Sowada, as saying: “Keeping God in out Constitution is ultimately an expression of the fact that those who govern us are accountable for their actions to someone other than themselves.” (p. 301) The delegate then noted there was “no particular support” for democracy in the Bible.

Overall, this book left me wondering if Australia (and America) are not fast approaching what might be described as “the Algeria problem” – having a significant (if not yet dominant) group of religious extremists who while using the instruments of democracy refuse to accept any obligation to maintain them.

More reviews: here and here, and a transcript of a Radio National programme on it.

Miscellaneous

Net nuggets No 6

* The woman who planned to kidnap the governor of Pennsylvania for ransom, Ann Carson, sounds fascinating, but apparently her ghost writer, Mary Carr, is even more worthy of note.

* On the joys of dealing with a legend, Saul Bellow’s editor.

* A search tool for Project Gutenberg texts. I haven’t fully checked it out yet, but it looks potentially brilliant.

* London’s abandoned Tube stations. Why? Why not?

* Almost a reason to visit New York: Before Victoria: Extraordinary Women of the British Romantic Era.

Friday Femmes Fatales

Friday femmes fatales No 4

“Where are all the female bloggers?” HERE, in my weekly “top ten.” Why “femmes fatales”? Because these are killer posts, selected for great ideas and great writing, general interest, and variety.

Lab Kat finds that living in a red state can seriously raise your blood pressure, as she hears how some of her workmates believe a traumatic late miscarriage must be an “Act of God”.

Notes from an exile, written by a Kiwi living in Canada, considers what the Waco siege reveals about America, and in particular American machismo, while Thoughts of an average woman reports how the American right extends its tentacles, assuming that those who felt for the plight of Terri Schiavo’s parents must also be anti-abortion, etc.

Saint Faron is visiting Agra, and pondering the sad decline of India since the days of Akbar, while Vixgirl, sounding remarkably like Sei Shonagon, ponders everyday pleasures and pains.

Rachie on Living for disco has also been going cultural, finding that networking across the language barrier does have its difficult moments. What’s new, pussycat is, however, remembering a small town, where the social highlight is “bumping into” someone in Woolies.

More fearful social interactions are explored by Purple Tigress on Blogcritics, as she tells how a friend struggled with the fear induced by a stalker, and Chez miscarriage ponders why a “Regular Arsehole” might be a better choice than a “Stealth Arsehole”, while Volsunga muses how a small slice of cheese can be a measure of loneliness.

If you missed last week’s edition, it is here.

***********

Please: In the next week if you read, or write, a post by a woman blogger and think “that deserves a wider audience” (particularly someone who doesn’t yet get many hits), send me an email (natalieben at gmail dot com) or drop a comment here.

Disclaimer: the views here might not reflect my own. I’m trying to choose from as wide a range of female bloggers as possible.