Monthly Archives: November 2006

History Media

Sshhhhh – don’t tell the marketing people

I’m reading, in very small snatches, Modernism on Fleet Street, by Patrick Collier (picked up from the London Library “new books” section because it has a chapter on Rose Macauley, about whom I’d like to know more.)

It covers the interactions between newspapers and some intellectuals, including TS Eliot and Virginia Woolf, and the panics around the rise of the “yellow”, popular press. All the kerfuffle now about blogs and online media – well it all sounds so familiar when you read this, written in 1922:

So, about 30 years ago, the ‘New Journalism’ was born. Headlines, scareheads, “snappy pars” and “stunts” took the place of literature, serious news and discussion. The note of papers rose from modulated reason to the yowl of an American baseball match, calculated not to convince but to paralyze the opponent. Pictures appeared, with adjectival commentations: “A Delightful Photo of a Charming Little Hostess”… The change has been so complete that one no longer notices anything about it.” (p.12)

But what really struck me was this little anecdote about marketing. (For those not in the UK I should preface this by noting that the dailies here are now locked in a vicious, and economically crazy, battle to offer “free” extras – CDs, DVDs, posters, dinosaur stickers! and similar.) So this felt immediately familiar:

“One of the period’s more dubious innovations was the circulation-inflating insurance scheme, in which anyone who died while carrying a copy of the newspaper would be given a death benefit.”

But please don’t pass this on to any marketing people you know… I wouldn’t want to be responsible.

If, however, you should be seeking a plot for a noir detective tale set in the Twenties – well it would make a great motive for murder – the marketing man desperate for his ploy to work.

Carnival of Feminists

A brilliant Carnival of Feminists

The Carnival of Feminists No 27 is up on Body Impolitic, and it is brilliant. There’s a great wrap-up of US election coverage, but also plenty of coverage from around the globe. But what really makes it stand out are some absolutely stunning images. You don’t even need to be able to read English to enjoy this one.

But don’t waste time over here: hop over there and check it out for yourself!

And when you’ve finished that, you can pop over to the call for submissions from Ginger on Diary of a Freak Magnet – she’s got lots of ideas should you want to write a special post for the carnival.

Feminism

Scare-ree

Pastor Heneghan of Gospel Community Church sees the issue of population growth in more biblical terms, specifically those taken from Genesis and Revelation. “Some people think that what I’m doing–having eleven children–is wrong. I don’t really get into that much. The Bible says ‘be fruitful and multiply.’ That’s my belief system. They don’t believe in God, so they think we have to conserve what we have. But in my belief system, He’s going to give us a new earth.” Overpopulation isn’t a problem in a universe where God promises a clean global slate.

From The Nation, about a large and fast-growing sect (naturally!), Quiverfull, that believes “God” should entirely control how many children a woman has, and her husband control everything she does.

… and that the “whites” must work to “outbreed” the blacks.

Lovely.

Environmental politics

How to tackle climate change?

I’ve no time for a serious and thoughtful post this evening, having spent most of the past few hours wrestling with Zonealarm. Why is it that anti-virus etc programmes always start out working well, then gradually get worse and worse?

I was going to uninstall and replace it, but it provide impossible to remove the programme without wrecking the machine – great way to keep people with you. So know I’ve bought the upgrade – and that won’t install. Grrrrrrrr!!!

Don’t get into Zonealarm is my advice.

Anyway, since I have no energy to do more than grumble, I’ll send you over to The Coffee House, for a not-too-serious quiz on climate change: what’s the best thing to do to tackle climate change. Nuking the US is offered as an option – undoubtedly effective, but no, I resisted the temptation to vote for it…

UPDATE: Link to quiz now added – sorry about that. I wasn’t in a good way last night!

Blogging/IT On other media

Update on Mike Newell

I expanded on my post below about Mike Newell’s sexist comments on Comment is Free this morning, then donned my hard hat in anticipation.

But I don’t know if it is getting more civil over there, or it is just my lucky day, but there’s quite a decent discussion going on, and only the odd bit of invective being thrown my way.

If you were there and got put off by the atmosphere, it might be worth giving it another go.

Feminism

Brickbat of the day

The assistant referee makes what you think is a bad decision about a penalty kick (although by no means is there unanimity on that point).

What do you blame? Of course it must be the referee’s gender that is at fault. Well, if she’s female: that’s the conclusion of the Luton football manager Mike Newell.

Funnily enough, I’ve never heard the same explanation for a male official – might be that you claim he needs glasses, that he can’t run fast enough, that he doesn’t really understand the game – but I’ve never heard a male’s gender blamed.

Newell said: “She should not be here. I know that sounds sexist, but I am sexist, so I am not going to be anything other than that.
“We have a problem in this country with political correctness, and bringing women into the game is not the way to improve refereeing and officialdom.
“It is absolutely beyond belief. When do we reach a stage when all officials are women, because then we are in trouble?
“It is bad enough with the incapable referees and linesmen we have, but if you start bringing in women, you have big problems.
“This is Championship football. This is not park football, so what are women doing here? It is tokenism, for the politically-correct idiots.”

Will be interesting to see the reaction to this. Just imagine what the reaction would be if he had said the same things about race. He’d be out on his ear in a second. Somehow, however, I’m not expecting that result when gender is the issue.