Monthly Archives: December 2007

Politics

Anarchists give a good quote

Peter Marshall’s Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism is really more if an encyclopedia than an account, covering the broadest possible spread of history and cultures. But it does prove that anarchists give a good quote:
Lao Tzu:
The more laws and restrictions there are,
The poorer people become.
The sharper men’s weapons,
The more trouble in the land.
…The more rules and regulations,
The more thieves and robbers.
(p.57)

For the Greek Stoic Zeno: “Natural man is an individual and social being. Although the Stoic doctrine headed towards self-sufficiency, they believed that man is ‘naturally made for society and action’. Zeno believed that together with the instinct for self-preservation which leads to egoism, there is also a social instinct which makes us hoin others and co-operate for the common good. While pleasure and freedom from pain might be ab advantage it is not a good, for Zeno asserted the official Stoic doctrine that virtue is the only desirable good.” (p. 70)

Bakunin: “The idea of God implies the abdication of reason and of justice; it is the most decisive negation of human liverty, and necessarily ends in the enslavement of mankind, both in theory and practice.” (p. 81)

From a form of medieval mysticism with parallels to the Sufis, the Heresy of the Free Spirit: “Marguerite Porete, who was tried and burned in Paris in 1311m has left us Mirouer des simples ames, the only complete work by a medieval adept to survive. She taught that at the seventh stage of illumination the soil becomes united with God and by his grace is liberated from sin. It needs no Church, no priesthood and no sacraments. … [they] should ‘do nothing but what pleases them; or if they do, they deprive themselves of peace, freedom and nobility'” (p. 88)

Fourier went far beyond the ideas of liberty, equality and fraternity put forward by the lawyers of the French Revolution. He recognized that social liberty without a degree of economic equality is meaningless. The philosophes of the 18th century were right to vaunt liberty – ‘it is the foremost desire of all creatures’ – but they forgot that in civilized societies liberty is illusory if the common people lack wealth: ‘When the wage-earning classes are poor, their independence is as fragile as a house without foundation. “(p. 150)

William Godwin, An Account of the Seminary (1783): “The state of society is incontestably artificial; the power of one man over another must be always deived from convention or from conquest: by nature we are equal.” (p. 194)
… “His starting point is that since human beings are oartakers of a common nature, it follows on the principle of impartial justice that the ‘good things of the world are a common stock, upon which one man has as valid a title as another to draw for what he wants.'” (p. 210)

Proudhon : “The sovereignty of reason having been substituted for that of revelation: the notion of contract succeeding to that of compulsion; economic critique revealing that political institutions must now be absorbed into the industrial organisam: we fearlessly conclude that the revolutionary formula can no longer be direct government or any kind of government, but must be: no more goverment.” (p. 247)

Emma Goldman at her trial in 1893:
Do you believe in the Supreme Being, Miss Goldman?
No sir, I do not.
Is there any government on earth whose laws you approve?
No, sir, for they are all against the people.
Why don’t you leave this country if you don’t like its laws?
Where shall I go? Everywhere on earth the laws are against the poor, and they tell me I cannot go to heaven, nor do I want to go there.” (p. 398)

In February 1970 the Kabouters [whose ‘principal theoretical spirit’ was Roel van Duyn) set up the ‘Orange Free State’ … with a social philosophy not “the socialism any more of the clenched fist, but of the interlaced fingers, of the erect penis, of the flying butterfly, of the moved glance, of the Holy Cat. It is anarchism.’ (p. 555)

Politics

Why two words?

Am currently read Laura Maria Agustin’s Sex at the Margins: Migration, Labour Markets and the Rescue Industry. More on its primary arguments later, but I have been musing on one point it makes: why do we have two terms: “expatriate” and “migrant worker”?

Aside from the fact that one generally comes from a First World country and the other from a Third World one, what is fundamentally different about their choices?

Agustin quotes the words of a hairdresser who had worked in Spain in a salon until a new local owner declared that he could only employee Spaniards, after which she entered the informal economy, working in clients’ homes and not declaring her business officially. It is only after the quote that Agustin reveals her source to be British – so is she an “expatriate” or a “migrant worker”?

Jawdroppingly – I hadn’t come across this before – there is a lively academic debate about whether working class migrants can be “cosmopolitan”. “Some fix migrant identity in a reluctant leavetaking and wariness towards the new, seeing their lives as a series of dry, instrumental decisions.” (p. 44)

Miscellaneous

Media potpourri

* Some good news: in South Korea, the preference for boy children over girls appears to be breaking down.

South Korea is the first of several Asian countries with large sex imbalances at birth to reverse the trend, moving toward greater parity between the sexes. Last year, the ratio was 107.4 boys born for every 100 girls, still above what is considered normal, but down from a peak of 116.5 boys born for every 100 girls in 1990…..
The most important factor in changing attitudes toward girls was the radical shift in the country’s economy that opened the doors to women in the work force as never before and dismantled long-held traditions, which so devalued daughters that mothers would often apologize for giving birth to a girl.

The hope is that just as South Korea was ahead of China and India in development, they might also follow it in this.

* An attempt to calculate if Britain could feed and clothe itself – the answer being probably yes, just (PDF). But what sort of agriculture?

… organic livestock-based agriculture, practised by orthodox methods and without supplementary measures, has the most difficulty sustaining the full UK population on the land available, while other management systems can do so with a more or less comfortable margin.
However organic livestock agriculture becomes more ef- ficient and sustainable when it is carried out in conjunction with other traditional and permacultural management practices which are integral to a natural fertility cycle. These include: feeding livestock upon food wastes and residues; returning human sewage to productive land; dispersal of animals on mixed farms and smallholdings, rather than concentration in large farms; local slaughter and food distribution; managing animals to ensure optimum recuperation of manure; and selecting and managing livestock, especially dairy cows, to be nitrogen providers rather than nitrogen stealers.
These measures demand more human labour, and more even dispersal of both livestock and humans around the country than chemical or vegan options. Effective pursuit of livestock-based organic agriculture of this kind requires a localized economy, and some degree of agrarian resettlement. Other management systems based on synthetic fertilizers or vegan principles lend themselves more easily to the levels of urbanization currently favoured by the dominant (and mostly urban) policy makers.

(But, I’d add into this equation the fact that city-dwellers are generally more energy-efficient than those living in the country.)

* Reading – if it is in long-term decline what does this mean for society? The New Yorker asks the question in an interesting survey of anthropological and brain scanning research, but one, I’d suggest, that hasn’t really caught up with the shift from television to the internet.

History

Happy Saturnalia

Since Christmas as a concept for me holds nothing but bad memories, I’ve always preferred “happy Saturnalia” (although lately I’ve found it seems to attract lots of odd looks, whereas a few years ago no one batted an eyelid – not sure why).

But was pleased to read Mary Beard’s account of how to do it properly.

What, you mean to say that you haven’t cut the woollen threads binding the feet of your statue of Saturn? No hope for your 2008 then…

Miscellaneous

How not to be a pub

The “Somers Town Coffee House” is not a favourite phrase in the traditional working class community in which I live. There was, I’ve been told, quite a stink when the licence was granted to the current owner, since it was not planning to – and doesn’t – open on weekends.

And quite a few of the locals have apparently been barred from it, as not fitting in with the “suits” who often spill out of its doors.

So the pub (which I believe it has been for a long time) that should be at the centre, the heart of the community, mostly has its doors closed.

There’s been a few too many suits for my taste, so I’ve never been in there, but tonight, late, tired, coming home, and thinking that the new Japanese sushi place – although excellent in its way – wasn’t quite what the weather ordered, I thought “a good pub feed”, that’s what I need. And I happened to have noticed signs offering food service to 10.

But no, the man told me, not only no food now, but no food at all today “since we’re celebrating the fact we’re on holiday until January 2”.

Nice for him, no doubt, but not so nice for anyone in the community who might happen to want a drink, or a feed, until then.

I won’t be trying again.

Given the centrality of the pub to English life, are there not rules about providing a service? Just wondering (and waiting for dinner to cook).

Science

So what’s so special about humans?

A selection of recently reported research shows that a lot of skills we homocentrically used to think of as special to us can be found in the animal kingdom, and sometimes at higher levels than our own.

1. Dogs have been able to identify different classes of photos – whether they are pictures of “dogs” or “landscapes” – classification by category. (And I can’t wait to see what the Japanese are going to do with the dog-adapted touch-screen computer, given the enthusiasm a few years ago for a canine translator).

2. Monkeys are about as good at mental arithmetic as college students.

If we could start thinking of ourselves as just another animal species it might be a very good antidote to hubris.