Category Archives: Environmental politics

Cycling Environmental politics

Regent’s Park to Greenwich, to Rainham Marshes, to Regent’s Park

Today the forecast was for cloud and mist and a maximum temp of 6 degrees, so of course I thought I’d take myself out for a nice little tootle on the bicycle, and advertised on the London Cycling Campaign email list was what was biled as a leisurely 12 mile run to Rainham Marches, starting from Greenwich, which is about 8 miles from home …. which I could do at him own pace.

I really should have known better. (On several counts – one of them being that Southwark cyclists’ idea of “leisurely” is my idea of “just keeping contact with the back of the bunch by gritting my teeth and giving it all I’ve got”.)

No, it was fun really – in a slightly beating your head against the brick wall sort of way. I just looked up the distance home from the marshes and it is about 22 miles – and that was after getting to Greenwich, and then doing, to one person’s odometer, 22 miles there (the scenic route via the Woolwich ferry.) So I must have done near 50 miles today… (if you say 80km it sounds even more impressive.)

If the text here is a little tilted my apologies – sitting rather oddly since my seat bones weren’t in the condition for this. (Not to mention my legs….) In fact (another use of the blog) I just looked up my last serious ride and it was August 12, which covered some of the same route – as far as Woolwich.)

Still there were some interesting sights, including these World War II concrete barges (possibly used for D-day? so made due to the wartime shortage of steel) rotting quietly by the river:

concretebarge

And we went through (scenic route might be an honorary title) London’s great rubbish dump. On the north bank of the Thames opposite Erith are these slightly out-of-place looking hills – and what indeed they are out of place – these were once marshes, like the survivor we were heading for, but they became London’s landfull site. The smell is awful – sour, fetid, almost indescribable really), and there are chimneys where the methane brewing up under these grass-covered monstrosities is burnt off.

Hate to think how much the Christmas season will be adding, if not here then elsewhere. And you have to wonder why it was put right beside the Thames. No doubt theoretically these is some lining supposed to stop it polluting the river, but…

(As this walker notes, this is also the end of the London Loop walking route – a bit of a rubbish finish…)

But Rainham Marshes have survived and should continue to do so, having recently been bought by the RSPB.

There’s a new and fascinatingly enviro-friendly visitors’ centre that even boasts defensive drawbridges, and 2.5 miles of boardwalks that would no doubt be great on a day with a little better weather. (Winter is supposed to be the best time for bird species.)

Unfortunately they haven’t got to the info panels yet – and since this area apparently preserves the medieval field system I’d like to have known more. Guess I’ll have to go back.

But next time I might catch the train…

Environmental politics

Pat on the back for a Labour man

Well it is in Scotland, and he does have a history of rebellion, but nonetheless, well done to the Labour minister who has resigned over the plan to replace the Trident nuclear subs.

Communities Minister Malcolm Chisholm has resigned from the Scottish government after voting with the SNP over the replacement of Trident.
He was one of four Labour members who supported the SNP’s motion opposing the replacement of the nuclear submarines with up-to-date models.
Mr Chisholm said his decision had been a “matter of principle”.
The Scottish Parliament failed to agree a position on the future of the Clyde-based fleet.

Environmental politics

Gaia strkes back?

I find the Gaia hypothesis a useful way sometimes to think about ecology, although I usually resist the temptation to anthropomorphise the planet. But it is hard not to think that with days of heavy fog around Heathrow in the run-up to Christmas, the planet is doing its best to defend itself: Stranded passengers turn to rail – maybe next year they’ll just go that way straight off, as they should for short trips within Europe.

Environmental politics

Why Santa votes Green

Entirely unoriginal, copied straight from my email (thanks Peter!). I’d be happy to provide a credit if anyone knows an “original” source, but rather good fun. (Who says Greens don’t have a sense of humour, and can’t make fun of the stereotypes about them?)
1. Long white beard
2. Funny looking hat
3. Uses very low emission (but not zero emission!) transport
4. Animal lover
5. Only flies once a year
6. Bad fashion sense
7. Slightly overweight man
8. Good hearted
9. Has appropriate 1 day / 364 days work-life balance
10. His other outfit is Green
11. Concerned about global warming as his house is at risk
12. Prefers biofuel heating systems to central heating

Environmental politics

Cheerful morning poll…

From the latest Guardian political poll:

The poll also shows that the Green party, and not rightwing groups such as the UK Independence party, poses the biggest threat to the main three parties.
Despite recent publicity about Conservative defections to Ukip, and fears inside the party that Mr Cameron’s remodelling of Conservative policy could alienate traditional support on the right, only 14% of Tory supporters say they might back Ukip instead.
Asked to name one or more other parties that they might support, Conservatives are much more likely to choose the Liberal Democrats or the Greens: 32% of Tories say they might vote Lib Dem and 19% say Green.
The result appears to strengthen Mr Cameron’s hand in arguing the Conservatives must embrace a radical environmental and social justice agenda.
Labour supporters are also more likely to switch to the Lib Dems (30%) or Greens (16%) than Ukip (9%).
Nationally, Green support stands at 3% this month, against Ukip on 1%.

Now all we’ve got to do is turn those positive feelings into votes…

Environmental politics Science

Thinking smarter, not harder

Something the Hanrahans of this world never seem to notice – over the past century the human race has been getting smarter, at least smarter at the sort of abstract reasoning that IQ tests measure. But interestingly in the most “advanced” human societies we have – the Scandinavian ones – this progress has stopped.

So says the researcher who found this:

If we are to make any further progress, we will have to start exercising different parts of our brain, particularly the parts controlling language acquisition and empathy, according to Professor Flynn, an emeritus professor at the University of Otago in New Zealand….
The challenge for humanity now is to enhance our ability to debate moral and social questions intelligently. One way to do this might be to concentrate on reading great works of literature which expand our vocabulary, critical acumen and emotional maturity.
But the fact that, as a society, we are unwilling to make the sacrifices necessary to preserve the environment, suggests we still have a long way to go on this front, Professor Flynn said.